On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:18:43AM +, Tim Bunce wrote :
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:27:05PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear list,
I wrote a simple CGI script using DBD::CSV on a linux
computer, and then installed it on a iMac G5. Its execution time is
now alomst 10 times
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:33:10AM -0800, Henri Asseily wrote :
Also note that DBD::CSV is significantly impacted by I/O speed. If your
IMac G5 has a 4200 rpm drive and your linux box has a 10k rpm one, that
makes quite a large difference.
Would that mean that running the script
On 2005-02-16 19:44:49 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:18:43AM +, Tim Bunce wrote :
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:27:05PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear list,
I wrote a simple CGI script using DBD::CSV on a linux
computer, and then installed it
From: Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/16 Wed AM 04:58:36 CST
Would that mean that running the script twice should
dramatically accelerate the execution because the file would then be
cached in memory? (which does not work, I just tried).
Keep in mind that it's not just
Hi, I'am using DBI::DB2 for a lot of program and now I
need to create a programme to archive data. So, I
would like to export data from database to a file and
then load that file in another db2 database.
Here is what I try:
$dbh-do(q{export to test.ixf of ixf select * from
steph_test}) or die
On Feb 16, 2005, at 2:58 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:33:10AM -0800, Henri Asseily wrote :
Also note that DBD::CSV is significantly impacted by I/O speed. If
your
IMac G5 has a 4200 rpm drive and your linux box has a 10k rpm one,
that
makes quite a large difference.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Total Elapsed Time = 63.19465 Seconds
User+System Time = 43.46465 Seconds
Exclusive Times
%Time ExclSec CumulS #Calls sec/call Csec/c Name
66.5 28.91 36.463 109445 0.0003 0.0003 SQL::Statement::eval_where
I'm the maintainer of DBD::CSV and while I don't have time
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:44:49PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As somebody kindly pointed me out that hardware differences
could have a strong impact on the results, I will suppose that this is
the reason why I have seen such speed inconsistencies, unless somebody
found something
I'm not a DB2 expert, but the analogous facility in Informix is UNLOAD
and that is emulated in the client (command line) program. That is,
IDS (Informix Dynamic Server) does not recognize UNLOAD as a statement
but DB-Access (CLP analogue) pretends that it does.
Similar problems affect other
