On 9/25/05, Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This coding may not be so difficult, but not easy for me.
The issue will be converting:
insert into foo ( field, fields ) values ( ... );
into
insert into foo ( field, fields ) values ( ?, ?, ? )
...especially if one of the values
Hi,
I m installing the bugzilla s/w for bugtracking. I requires following 3
software components :
I have installed mysql at /usr/local/mysql-4.1.14
I have installed perl at /usr/local/perl-5.8.7
I have installed many perl modules /usr/local/perl_modules
(All are compiled from the source)
On 9/26/05 5:01 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Anyone else have a DBI subclassing story to tell?
My story is short: I never seriously attempted it because I knew how scary
and non-standard DBI was internally. Several times in my misspent youth I
wanted to do something simple like:
package MyDBI;
I've poked at this a bit more - if I install the full client it works
OK, which suggests there is something odd in the way the client shared
objects are being linked - a full install relinks the .so files but the
instant client install doesn't. I'll try dropping the relinked shared
objects
Users of the MySQL database manager should find
this interesting. MySQL 5 is in release
candidate status.
Besides the obvious big ticket new features, I
would find the information schema and strict
mode etc features very useful. The former is a
very good and standard way to get meta-data
On Sep 23, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
I'm interested to hear stories of people who have subclassed the DBI,
or used modules that subclass the DBI.
Was subclassing the DBI a good approach?
Where there any problems?
Could it have been done well/better some other way?
Thanks!
Tim.
