Re: OCI_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO behaviour (Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Oracle 1.10)

2001-09-27 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:10:41PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: Oddly, I never received a copy of my own message. This has happened previous times I posted as well but some people on the list

Re: OCI_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO behaviour (Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Oracle 1.10)

2001-09-27 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:05:47PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this reverting to the previous behaviour? Is there a simply way to recognize this condition? A wrapper function would be fine. Tim. Any chance of answering my other two

Re: OCI_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO behaviour (Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Oracle 1.10)

2001-09-25 Thread Greg Stark
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: Oddly, I never received a copy of my own message. This has happened previous times I posted as well but some people on the list responded that they had received my posts and obviously Tim saw it

Re: OCI_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO behaviour (Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Oracle 1.10)

2001-09-24 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: I was about to upgrade our installation when I noticed this in the changelog. Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Changes in DBD::Oracle 1.09 27th August 2001 Changed behaviour when OCIStmtExecute() returns

OCI_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO behaviour (Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Oracle 1.10)

2001-09-21 Thread Greg Stark
I was about to upgrade our installation when I noticed this in the changelog. Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Changes in DBD::Oracle 1.09 27th August 2001 Changed behaviour when OCIStmtExecute() returns OCI_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO: used to be treated as OCI_SUCCESS, now also sets