On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:10:41PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
Oddly, I never received a copy of my own message. This has happened previous
times I posted as well but some people on the list
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:05:47PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this reverting to the previous behaviour?
Is there a simply way to recognize this condition?
A wrapper function would be fine.
Tim.
Any chance of answering my other two
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
Oddly, I never received a copy of my own message. This has happened previous
times I posted as well but some people on the list responded that they had
received my posts and obviously Tim saw it
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
I was about to upgrade our installation when I noticed this in the changelog.
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Changes in DBD::Oracle 1.09 27th August 2001
Changed behaviour when OCIStmtExecute() returns
I was about to upgrade our installation when I noticed this in the changelog.
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Changes in DBD::Oracle 1.09 27th August 2001
Changed behaviour when OCIStmtExecute() returns OCI_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO:
used to be treated as OCI_SUCCESS, now also sets