On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:05:05 +0200, Peter J . Holzer wrote:
>I don't trust the Benchmark module, though. It reported one negative
>"wallclock secs" value at every run, and the wallclock and usr times
>differ too much for a test which should essentially take 100% user time.
Are you saying you wan
I modified Peter J. Holzer's code to test both the case where the
$i is set to 1 (Holzer's case) and where $i is 0 (which forces
more assignments). I also added a straight assignment
statement to each set. The program and results are below.
This test was run three times on a Sun Ultra 5, with So
On 2001-09-13 17:01:20 -0400, Rob Ransbottom wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have a minor optimization suggestion. Instead of this:
>
> > unless ($sth_routine_name) {
> > #setup statement handle
> > }
>
> > Do this:
> >
> > $sth_routine_name ||= $dbh->prepare
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 05:01:20PM -0400, Rob Ransbottom wrote:
> > Talk about infinitesimal differences.
>
> Exactly. I'd rather spend my time on the bigger performance issues
> and then, if there's any time left over, go and have a beer...
I agree in th
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 05:01:20PM -0400, Rob Ransbottom wrote:
> Talk about infinitesimal differences.
Exactly. I'd rather spend my time on the bigger performance issues
and then, if there's any time left over, go and have a beer...
Tim.
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a minor optimization suggestion. Instead of this:
> unless ($sth_routine_name) {
> #setup statement handle
> }
> Do this:
>
> $sth_routine_name ||= $dbh->prepare();
> pretty sure this is more efficient than setting up the unless b
