Re: db2 - persistent connection

2006-09-06 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2006-09-05 08:08:54 -0600, Darin McBride wrote: On Monday 04 September 2006 22:28, Jack Faley ( The Tao of Jack ) wrote: Thank you for your reply. If their was any way to mitigate the small exits I would do it but I'm modifying an app that was never meant to be extensible. So, you are

Re: db2 - persistent connection

2006-09-05 Thread Darin McBride
On Monday 04 September 2006 22:28, Jack Faley ( The Tao of Jack ) wrote: Thank you for your reply. If their was any way to mitigate the small exits I would do it but I'm modifying an app that was never meant to be extensible. So, you are correct, Im moving the load to a daemon in the middle

Re: db2 - persistent connection

2006-09-04 Thread Darin McBride
On Saturday 02 September 2006 00:21, Jack Faley ( The Tao of Jack ) wrote: I have several ( 100 - 200 ) small exits c oming from an app that update db2 tables. This works fine but the dba's don't like that many open connection overheads. This isn't cgi/apache. These are all seperate

Re: db2 - persistent connection

2006-09-04 Thread Jack Faley ( The Tao of Jack )
On 9/4/06, Darin McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 02 September 2006 00:21, Jack Faley ( The Tao of Jack ) wrote: I have several ( 100 - 200 ) small exits c oming from an app that update db2 tables. This works fine but the dba's don't like that many open connection overheads. This

db2 - persistent connection

2006-09-02 Thread Jack Faley ( The Tao of Jack )
I have several ( 100 - 200 ) small exits c oming from an app that update db2 tables. This works fine but the dba's don't like that many open connection overheads. This isn't cgi/apache. These are all seperate terminating processes. From what I gather there is no way to pass the dbh between