--- Rob Kinyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/29/07, John Napiorkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I think the main idea is to push stuff into a
> > configuration file when it's not code that doing
> > logical work. This way I can push down some
> simple
> > maintenance work to admins. A
On 7/29/07, John Napiorkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the main idea is to push stuff into a
> configuration file when it's not code that doing
> logical work. This way I can push down some simple
> maintenance work to admins. Also I've been playing
> with MooseX::IOC lately and think
> --- Jess Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, John Napiorkowski wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am seriously considering writing a system to
> > create
> > > DBIx Classes via a configuration file.
> > > And someone was writing a backend
> >
> > for ::Schema
--- Jess Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, John Napiorkowski wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am seriously considering writing a system to
> create
> > DBIx Classes via a configuration file. Since the
> > default for creating these classes are primarily
> > package m
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, John Napiorkowski wrote:
Hi,
I am seriously considering writing a system to create
DBIx Classes via a configuration file. Since the
default for creating these classes are primarily
package method calls I think this could be pretty
easy.
So we could replace:
package my
John Napiorkowski wrote:
> --- Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:44:23AM -0700, John
>> Napiorkowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am seriously considering writing a system to
>> create
>>> DBIx Classes via a configuration file. Since the
>>> default for creating
--- Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:44:23AM -0700, John
> Napiorkowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am seriously considering writing a system to
> create
> > DBIx Classes via a configuration file. Since the
> > default for creating these classes are primarily
>
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:44:23AM -0700, John Napiorkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seriously considering writing a system to create
> DBIx Classes via a configuration file. Since the
> default for creating these classes are primarily
> package method calls I think this could be pretty
> easy.
Why
Hi,
I am seriously considering writing a system to create
DBIx Classes via a configuration file. Since the
default for creating these classes are primarily
package method calls I think this could be pretty
easy.
So we could replace:
package myapp::Schema::foo
__PACKAGE__->load_components( ...
