Matt S Trout wrote:
While I remember: can everybody with an active branch off -current sing
out and tell us
(1) what it's designed for
source-handle branch - replaces all -result_source with a
(schema,source_name) tuple.
``This module removes fixed link between Rows/ResultSets and the
Matt S Trout wrote:
While I remember: can everybody with an active branch off -current sing
out and tell us
(1) what it's designed for
(2) where it's up to
(3) when you expect it to be ready for audit before merge to -current
Note: If it's already ready for audit, kick me and I'll try
--- Carl Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/12/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
While I remember: can everybody with an active
branch off -current sing
out and tell us
columns_info_for
(1) what it's designed for
Detailed column specs (as much as each database will
On 12/21/06, John Napiorkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is you new 'columns_info_for' method accessed?
Right now columns_info_for (the method, as opposed to the branch, but
I'm assuming the branch extends the same basic concepts the current
method has...) is in a deprecated state. In
On 21/12/06, John Napiorkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Carl Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/12/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
While I remember: can everybody with an active
branch off -current sing
out and tell us
columns_info_for
(1) what it's designed for
While I remember: can everybody with an active branch off -current sing
out and tell us
(1) what it's designed for
(2) where it's up to
(3) when you expect it to be ready for audit before merge to -current
Note: If it's already ready for audit, kick me and I'll try and have a
look over it
On 12/20/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I remember: can everybody with an active branch off -current sing
out and tell us
The only one I have left laying out there is compose_stuff
(1) what it's designed for
This was supposed to be extensions to compose_namespace, etc to
--- Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I remember: can everybody with an active
branch off -current sing
out and tell us
(1) what it's designed for
dbix-param_bind is an update to the way sql statements
are executed so that we can pass attributes to the
binding statements.
Jesper Krogh wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
pg_bytea
- not even sure whose this is anymore
- doesn't seem to have any changes; I'm guessing this is 08+ ?
Mine, just delete it .. (perhaps I can do that myself). I was trying to
pass the result-source instead of the tablename to the Storage
Carl Franks wrote:
columns_info_for
- Carl Franks?
- don't think this has been worked on much yet?
This won't be making it in.
As far as I remember, its mysql support is complete.
No support for other backends yet though.
If it (a) works, (b) is an improvement on what's in -current,
Aran Deltac wrote:
many_to_many
- bluefeet, jguenther?
- would like to see this for 07 but it's an incremental improvement
to helper stuff so we can probably sneak it into an 07xxx if we have to
Got stumped on it, probably something silly. If anyone wants to help
with this one I'd
On 5/24/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aran Deltac wrote:
many_to_many
- bluefeet, jguenther?
- would like to see this for 07 but it's an incremental improvement
to helper stuff so we can probably sneak it into an 07xxx if we have to
Got stumped on it, probably
On 5/24/06, Aran Deltac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How far along are the test cases? If they're there I can try and have a
look, but I'm a bit tight for time to do that as well.
No test cases (yet).
For me this little project was more
On 5/24/06, Justin Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/06, Aran Deltac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/06, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How far along are the test cases? If they're there I can try and have a
look, but I'm a bit tight for time to do that as well.
No
On 2006-05-24 13:20:32 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
find_compat
- dwc
- needs to merge back for 07 since it makes older find semantics
still work without disrupting the new and improved unique-key-driven
find
I started last night by allowing the non-unique queries through and by
adding
Daniel Westermann-Clark wrote:
On 2006-05-24 13:20:32 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
find_compat
- dwc
- needs to merge back for 07 since it makes older find semantics
still work without disrupting the new and improved unique-key-driven
find
I started last night by allowing the
16 matches
Mail list logo
