On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:39:40PM +0200, Ben Staude wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 18 Juli 2007 19:26 schrieb Ben Staude:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Making a patch for this unfortunately is far beyond my horizon. Has it at
> > all been intended to have mk_classaccessor in ::Storage::Statistics? If
> > not, what's t
Am Mittwoch 18 Juli 2007 19:26 schrieb Ben Staude:
[snip]
> Making a patch for this unfortunately is far beyond my horizon. Has it at
> all been intended to have mk_classaccessor in ::Storage::Statistics? If
> not, what's the recommonded way to store class data (effectivly, I collect
> the execut
Am Mittwoch 18 Juli 2007 14:58 schrieb Matt S Trout:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:42:54AM +1000, brett gardner wrote:
> > mk_classaccessor works fine for me in schema objects in 0.8003., but
> > DBIx::Class::Storage::Statistics doesnt have the same ancestors that the
> > schema objects do.
>
> Pres
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:42:54AM +1000, brett gardner wrote:
> mk_classaccessor works fine for me in schema objects in 0.8003., but
> DBIx::Class::Storage::Statistics doesnt have the same ancestors that the
> schema objects do.
Presumably it used to.
A patch and test to put this back would be
mk_classaccessor works fine for me in schema objects in 0.8003., but
DBIx::Class::Storage::Statistics doesnt have the same ancestors that the
schema objects do.
Ben Staude wrote:
Hi there,
recently there was a discussion on the list about mk_classaccessor
having "dissapeared" with 0.8002, an
