On 3 Nov 2008, at 12:28, Ash Berlin wrote:
Yeah, I think the best plan of attack is to move as much out of
DBIC::SQL::A as possible, and then bump the dep on DBIC to SQL::A
1.50. If you are going to make changes to DBIC, can you please so on
a branch (assuming you have commit access, if
On 3 Nov 2008, at 11:46, BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:48:56 +0100 Peter Rabbitson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a mostly-working-1.x-rc at
http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/SQL-Abstract/1.x/branches/1.50_RC
.
Patches should be made against it afaik, although
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:48:56 +0100 Peter Rabbitson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a mostly-working-1.x-rc at
http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/SQL-Abstract/1.x/branches/1.50_RC.
Patches should be made against it afaik, although it is very possible
this particular bit has been already
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:32:24 + Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah, I think the best plan of attack is to move as much out of
DBIC::SQL::A as possible, and then bump the dep on DBIC to SQL::A
1.50.
Green light, cool. I'll do my best to clean it up.
If you are going to make
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:28:40 + Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah, I think the best plan of attack is to move as much out of
DBIC::SQL::A as possible, and then bump the dep on DBIC to SQL::A
1.50.
Matters got bit more complicated: some bits should be merged into
