Thank you! It seems to be old enough for my Debian installations.
4 Май 2016 г. 23:51 пользователь "Matthew Somerville"
написал:
> On 4 May 2016 at 21:19, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> > When did this possibility appeared?
>
> Looks like it first appeared in 0.08204 (2012-11-08), Changes has:
>
On 4 May 2016 at 21:19, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> When did this possibility appeared?
Looks like it first appeared in 0.08204 (2012-11-08), Changes has:
* New Features / Changes
- SQLMaker now accepts \'literal' with the 'for' rs attribute as an
override to the builtin FOR o
I’m not sure, but I do know that it wasn’t supported and the most recent
re-write introduced it.
On 4 May 2016, at 13:19, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> Dear Francisco,
> Thank you!
> When did this possibility appeared?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dear Francisco,
Thank you!
When did this possibility appeared?
4 Май 2016 г. 23:09 пользователь "Francisco Obispo"
написал:
> just use the scalar version:
>
> for
> Value: ( 'update' | 'shared' | \$scalar )
>
>Set to 'update' for a SELECT ... FOR UPDATE or 'shared' for a SELECT
>... FOR
just use the scalar version:
for
Value: ( 'update' | 'shared' | \$scalar )
Set to 'update' for a SELECT ... FOR UPDATE or 'shared' for a SELECT
... FOR SHARED. If \$scalar is passed, this is taken directly and
embedded in the query.
with
```
{
for => \q{U
Hello,
is there a support for the PostgreSQL SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED clause
in the DBIx::Class? And how difficult is to add it if not?
Thank you!
--
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
___
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC
