On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:42:26 +0100 Stuart Dodds wrote:
> > You would then do something like:
> >
> > $town->town_people_mayor->mayor
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Yes, that works perfectly...thank you!
You're welcome!
> It would have been nice to do it in one step as I wouldn't need to
> change the
On 29/01/18 17:31, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> Something like (in Result::Town):
>
> __PACKAGE__->might_have(
> "town_people_mayor",
> "MyApp::Schema::Result::TownPeople",
> sub {
> my $args = shift;
> return {
> "$args->{foreign_alias}.town_id" => { -ident
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:34:14 +0100 Stuart Dodds wrote:
> I have a many to many relationship over a joining table, eg.
>
> towns -> town_people -> people
>
> In some cases it is possible for there to be has_one relationships
> between the two outer tables. It's a bit of a contrived example but
Hi,
I have a many to many relationship over a joining table, eg.
towns -> town_people -> people
In some cases it is possible for there to be has_one relationships
between the two outer tables. It's a bit of a contrived example but lets
say a person can live in multiple towns but only one is her
