Re: FW: [Dbix-class] Filtering module

2008-11-21 Thread Jess Robinson
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] $obj-get_column($col); # COLUMN VALUE $obj-$col; # ATTRIBUTE VALUE If I could time travel, I'd make it _get_column so this fact was

Re: FW: [Dbix-class] Filtering module

2008-11-14 Thread Zbigniew Lukasiak
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] $obj-get_column($col); # COLUMN VALUE $obj-$col; # ATTRIBUTE VALUE If I could time travel, I'd make it _get_column so this fact was obvious. But too much code now relies on it,

Re: FW: [Dbix-class] Filtering module

2008-11-13 Thread Matt S Trout
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Todd Rinaldo wrote: I too would like to see inflate be a little more transparent. I haven't had to deal with it in a month or so, but I know that in some DBIC calls, you get the raw value of the column and in others, you get the inflated value.

Re: FW: [Dbix-class] Filtering module

2008-11-13 Thread Octavian Rasnita
From: Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] $obj-get_column($col); # COLUMN VALUE $obj-$col; # ATTRIBUTE VALUE If I could time travel, I'd make it _get_column so this fact was obvious. But too much code now relies on it, sadly. I suspect when we create a new, cleaner row object interface, perhaps

Re: FW: [Dbix-class] Filtering module

2008-10-23 Thread Jess Robinson
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Todd Rinaldo wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 6:12 AM To: dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk I'm not sure if this was Eugeny's intention, but I read it as a proposal to make a mode where