On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:25:06PM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> For people not currently running custom Perl on their RHEL based
> distros:
>
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0876.html
>
> Looks like they've (finally) fixed the bless/overload issue.
Can somebody test this and figur
Moritz Onken wrote:
>
> Am 18.09.2008 um 14:35 schrieb Christopher H. Laco:
>
>> Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 Sep 2008, at 11:25, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>>>
Does anyone know if (and how) this patch can be applied to Fedora?
>>>
>>> Fedora 8 has a lesser version of this patch alre
Am 18.09.2008 um 14:35 schrieb Christopher H. Laco:
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On 18 Sep 2008, at 11:25, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Does anyone know if (and how) this patch can be applied to Fedora?
Fedora 8 has a lesser version of this patch already in it, no idea if
they will (or have) re-i
On 18/09/2008, at 10:05 PM, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On 18 Sep 2008, at 11:25, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Does anyone know if (and how) this patch can be applied to Fedora?
Fedora 8 has a lesser version of this patch already in it, no idea if
they will (or have) re
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
> On 18 Sep 2008, at 11:25, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if (and how) this patch can be applied to Fedora?
>
> Fedora 8 has a lesser version of this patch already in it, no idea if
> they will (or have) re-issue with the additional bits in it.
>
> Fe
On 18 Sep 2008, at 11:25, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Does anyone know if (and how) this patch can be applied to Fedora?
Fedora 8 has a lesser version of this patch already in it, no idea if
they will (or have) re-issue with the additional bits in it.
Fedora 9 uses perl 5.10 which has never h
Hi,
Does anyone know if (and how) this patch can be applied to Fedora?
Thanks.
From: "Nigel Metheringham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Looks like they've (finally) fixed the bless/overload issue.
>>
>>
>> Is this the bug referred to by the DBIx startup message?
>
> Yes.
>
> And the bug that all the
On 18 Sep 2008, at 09:34, Dermot wrote:
2008/9/18 Tom Lanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For people not currently running custom Perl on their RHEL based
distros:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0876.html
Looks like they've (finally) fixed the bless/overload issue.
Is this the bug
2008/9/18 Tom Lanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For people not currently running custom Perl on their RHEL based distros:
>
>http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0876.html
>
> Looks like they've (finally) fixed the bless/overload issue.
Is this the bug referred to by the DBIx startup messag
