[Dbix-class] DBD::Sybase - Can't call ping() with active statement handles - any ideas?

I'm trying to build a simple Catalyst CRUD application using DBIx::Class 0.08010 and DBD::Sybase connecting to a SQL Server 2005 instance. I've installed DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::Sybase and ::Sybase::MSSQL of course. Now selects work fine, but whenever I try to insert a record with

[Dbix-class] multiple has_many rels in prefetch not supported in 0.081?

Hi, I installed the latest svn revision of DBIx-Class-0.08099_04 and my code fails serval times because I prefetch multiple has_many rels. This was no problem with 0.08010. Why did you change this behaviour? I didn't read anything about this on thsi list. I have to change a lot of code for

Re: [Dbix-class] multiple has_many rels in prefetch not supported in 0.081?

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Moritz Onken wrote: Hi, I installed the latest svn revision of DBIx-Class-0.08099_04 and my code fails serval times because I prefetch multiple has_many rels. This has never worked. Now it errors instead of doing something random. If you had

Re: [Dbix-class] DBD::Sybase - Can't call ping() with active statement handles - any ideas?

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:08:33PM +0100, Nick Dixon wrote: I'm trying to build a simple Catalyst CRUD application using DBIx::Class 0.08010 and DBD::Sybase connecting to a SQL Server 2005 instance. I've installed DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::Sybase and ::Sybase::MSSQL of course. Those are

Re: [Dbix-class] multiple has_many rels in prefetch not supported in 0.081?

Moritz Onken wrote: Hi, I installed the latest svn revision of DBIx-Class-0.08099_04 and my code fails serval times because I prefetch multiple has_many rels. This was no problem with 0.08010. Why did you change this behaviour? I didn't read anything about this on thsi list. I have to

[Dbix-class] Integration with Moose (DBIx-enabled Moose objects)?

Hi, I'm starting a new project using Moose[1] and am wondering how best to handle persistent storage of these Moose objects. If I weren't using Moose, DBIx::Class would be the obvious answer here. However, in a way Moose and DBIx::Class seem to overlap in terms of the functionality that they