Re: [Dbix-class] Filtering out inactive records

The general ambiguity problem is easily solvable, what you need is the 'current_source_alias'. That allows you to disambiguate your field references and it works perfectly in the chained searches.

Re: [Dbix-class] 5/5 Why "a stability tzar" is a ridiculous proposition

> > Does it need to be a single person? Could it be a team responsibility like > a Toyota-style "Stop the Line" button? I think a community can decide how it > wants to mechanically run a stop process. > > The important thing – if stability is truly important – is making sure that > people with

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

On 5 October 2016 at 11:23, Leo Lapworth wrote: > Hi, > > On 5 October 2016 at 10:44, Peter Rabbitson wrote: >> On 10/05/2016 08:50 AM, Karen Etheridge wrote: It is now much harder to advance either of these points. >>> >>> Why? >>> >> Because

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

On 5 October 2016 at 09:07, David Golden wrote: > * DBIx::Class2 (DBIC2) – new feature development, with lower stability > expectations > The idea of a new project with lower stability expectations worries me. The idea of backwards compatibility and stability have been a major part

Re: [Dbix-class] A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

I and the company I work for are a heavy user of DBIC. We consider it's well being and stability to have been amazing so far. Having largely single developer maintain the project has always amazed me, and as great as some of the results have been in the past, it doesn't look like it's really a