Re: [Dbix-class] unable to install via cpan

On 01/04/2017 06:41 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: Hi all, maybe this is really trivial, however I cannot get DBIx::Class installed via cpan: % perl --version ~ This is perl 5, version 25, subversion 8 (v5.25.8) built for x86_64-linux (with 1 registered patch,

Re: [Dbix-class] Governance: Proposal A is adopted

On 12/08/2016 07:10 AM, David Golden wrote: Given the pattern of votes, I see no need to tally the exact numbers. The vast majority of voters clearly want the community to manage of the DBIx::Class namespace. I want to thank everyone for their participation and patience. As I've just woken

Re: [Dbix-class] ★ VOTE NOW: DBIC Governance and Namespace Control ★

On 12/05/2016 01:15 AM, David Golden wrote: Thank you to everyone who has been participating in or just reading the various governance discussions since my initial email to the DBIC list of Oct 3. [1] Proposal A ___ List:

Re: [Dbix-class] Decision time: which fork inherits the existing DBIx::Class namespace

On 12/03/2016 04:48 AM, Darren Duncan wrote: I agree now that MST's proposal should govern the DBIx::Class namespace as what "cpan DBIx::Class" resolves to, and users wanting Peter's fork can update their dependency lists per his proposal. That's my position, too. Let's move forward. Jim

Re: [Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion

On 10/31/2016 07:22 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:43:31 Matt S Trout wrote: Otherwise, I would suggest that you turn your plan into a full proposal, TBH, I didn't even realise I was making a proposal until I saw the results[1]. I was merely bringing

Re: [Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

On 10/24/2016 07:11 AM, Leo Lapworth wrote: Can we agree on the new governance... first? Then IF (and so far no one seems to have suggested plans for this) there is ever a change that could cause instability or break backwards compat or has any major risk, the voting policy can be enacted to

Re: [Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: An actually concrete proposal w/bootstrap governance system

On 10/18/2016 12:51 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: =end GOVERNANCE What say ye? This sounds like a reasonable starting point for me. +1 ___ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN:

Re: [Dbix-class] A slightly more concrete proposal

On 10/04/2016 04:17 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: Since people seem to be unsure as to what the alternative to riba's project freeze would actually be, let me provide something a little more concrete. This is intended as a basis for discussion rather than a complete plan, but I thought it was worth