It would probably be more intuitive to return something like:
{
element = {
concept = { concept_id = nnn, foldername = 'xxx' },
...
},
...
}
?
I've a couple of similar queries that I wrote before I started using HRI
much, though I had to use +select/+as then
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:23:50AM +, Will Crawford wrote:
It would probably be more intuitive to return something like:
{
element = {
concept = { concept_id = nnn, foldername = 'xxx' },
...
},
...
}
?
At first glance yes. The problem here is that you
On 22 February 2013 11:36, Peter Rabbitson rabbit+d...@rabbit.us wrote:
At first glance yes. The problem here is that you are incorrectly
assuming that given 'concept.concept_id' one can simply infer we are
talking about the 'concept' from join = { element = 'concept' }.
However the moment
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:45:54AM +, Will Crawford wrote:
On 22 February 2013 11:36, Peter Rabbitson rabbit+d...@rabbit.us wrote:
At first glance yes. The problem here is that you are incorrectly
assuming that given 'concept.concept_id' one can simply infer we are
talking about the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:05:53PM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
. . . the map is strictly mirroring the
current relationship graph of your schema.
To clarify this bit as it is in contradiction with
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2013-February/09.html
The old behavior will
At work we had to freeze our DBIC at 0.08196 until the prefetch/namespace
bug was fixed ... which it was recently.
Internally we've built the new perl+cpandeps RPM including DBIx::Class
0.08206. Things are looking great for the prefetch/namespace fix but
something has come to light this week that
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:46:46PM +, Chisel wrote:
At work we had to freeze our DBIC at 0.08196 until the prefetch/namespace
bug was fixed ... which it was recently.
Internally we've built the new perl+cpandeps RPM including DBIx::Class
0.08206. Things are looking great for the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Peter Rabbitson rabbit+d...@rabbit.us wrote:
The test is comprehensive enough, no further questions. It would be
great if you could convert it to a DBIC-internal test, for example based
off of:
