On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:02:27AM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> From https://metacpan.org/module/DBIx::Class::Row#delete
> :: If you delete an object within a txn_do() (see "txn_do" in
> :: DBIx::Class::Storage) and the transaction subsequently fails, the
> :: result object will remain marked
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:12:49AM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:57:45PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > I've always thought that this is something that should be handled by the
> > database, not by DBIx::Class - or at least that it should be something
> > that you hav
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:30:03PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> Eeuuww!
>
> I would thunk that in_storage should be "rolled back" too.
>
How would you implement that? (as in how would the perl logic actually
look)
___
List: http://lists.scsys.co
On 26 March 2013 20:12, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:57:45PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:58:31AM +1300, Paul Findlay wrote:
>> > > I tried to use delete_all, but there is no primary key in the table so
>> > > it failed. what else can i do?
>>
On 27 March 2013 13:33, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:12:49AM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:57:45PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
>> > I've always thought that this is something that should be handled by the
>> > database, not by DBIx::Class - or a
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:49:53PM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:30:03PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Eeuuww!
> > I would thunk that in_storage should be "rolled back" too.
> How would you implement that? (as in how would the perl logic actually
> look)
in the cod
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:54 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:49:53PM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:30:03PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > Eeuuww!
> > > I would thunk that in_storage should be "rolled back" too.
> > How would you implement t
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:54:00PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:49:53PM +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:30:03PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > Eeuuww!
> > > I would thunk that in_storage should be "rolled back" too.
> > How would you imp
Hey Riba,
as an update to this: I've got sybase up and running on my VM, but can't
get the damn DBD compiled against it. I'll keep you posted if I figure it
out. Starting to see what you meant by 'massive bitch'.
Cheers,
Matt
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Cu
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently the dev team does not have an easy access to a Sybase ASE
> server (properly installing and configuring one is a massive bitch). If
Gendered language, man. I know you didn't mean it as an insult to
anyone, but it costs u
10 matches
Mail list logo