On 8 August 2011 10:11, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> koxon wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Any help on this ?
>>
...
He also wrote:
> Thanks
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://dbix-class.35028.n2.nabble.com/SQL-Query-generation-issue-tp6656054p6662816.html
> Sent from the DBIx-Class mai
Can you resend the original message along with a larger sample of the
code that's issuing the queries? I saw some similar mess a while ago
that was caused by inadvertently passing a hashref instead of a value
somewhere in the search parameters ...
On 8 August 2011 02:20, koxon wrote:
> Hello all,
On 31 August 2011 07:29, koxon wrote:
> *Use of uninitialized value in exists at
> //ms/dist/perl5/PROJ/DBIx-Class/0.08195/lib/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI/Sybase/ASE.pm
> line 266.*
if (($op eq 'insert' && $bound_identity_col) ||
- ($op eq 'update' && exists $args->[0]{$identity_col}))
Use CURRENT_DATE or _TIMESTAMP instead (I hit a problem with using
'now' with Pg in DBIC due to use of prepared statements, puzzled over
it for weeks before finding the solution :)).
2011/9/8 Alex Povolotsky :
> Hello!
>
> I've tried to use Catalyst::TraitFor::Model::DBIC::Schema::Caching to
> dec
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-06/msg00015.php sums it
up fairly well.
On 8 September 2011 12:36, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:49:10AM +0100, Will Crawford wrote:
>> Use CURRENT_DATE or _TIMESTAMP instead (I hit a problem with using
>> '
On 31 August 2011 13:02, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Will Crawford gave you the correct fix already a bit earlier. It will be
> included in the next version of DBIC.
In fairness, I think I replied after he'd asked :)
___
List: http://lists.
On 30 September 2011 06:39, Janne Snabb wrote:
> I am using dbicdump to create and update my DBIC schema from the
> database schema. It creates a Schema.pm with the following line in it:
>
> use base 'DBIx::Class::Schema';
>
> ...which I have to change to:
>
> use base 'DBIx::Class::Schema::Confi
On 20 October 2011 13:28, Roger Day wrote:
> It's DBIC (possibly, but not I thnik likely) that I think is creating the
> superfluous <*>, as it is creating the wrapper around the original piece of
> SQL - which I give below as well.
The <*> is provided by Oracle as part of the error message that
On 26 October 2011 12:00, Roger Day wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think I've done all the right things for inserting a date-time into a
> Oracle date field, but I keep getting this:
>
> DBI Exception: DBD::Oracle::st execute failed: ORA-01861: literal does not
> match format string (DBD ERROR: error possibly
On 28 October 2011 11:37, dorian taylor wrote:
> Interesting, because the literal would be "interval '6 months'", which
> unless I'm huffing paint would translate to "interval ?". :)
Mmm, paint
I think it's "interval" "6" "month(s?)" which would translate to
"interval ? ?" ... but the mont
$rs->search( \%implicit_params )->search( ... stuff passed into your
function ...);
I've occasionally done this more overtly by having a ->with_filter_X
method on the result set, and called it like
$foo_rs->with_melitta->search( \%user_supplied_params ) ... good
examples would be where you have, s
change the value to \'CURRENT_TIMESTAMP' or \'CURRENT_DATE' :)
if this isn't a long-running process, 'now' (without the parentheses)
will probably work.
On 16 March 2012 20:32, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to use:
>
> $self->update_or_create({
> symbol => $symbol,
> market =>
On 19 March 2012 12:33, Websuche :: Felix Ostmann wrote:
> We run into the same problem and simple split the problem. Make a find, then
> update or create (simple look what update_or_create do internally)
>
> 2012/3/19 Will Crawford
>>
>> change the value to
On 26 July 2012 00:16, Greg Hill wrote:
...
> It seems to boil down to the DBIx::Class::Resultset:: _rs_update_delete
> method should be ignoring stuff like prefetch and order_by when being called
> by 'delete'. But maybe there's a scenario where that behavior is desirable?
There are cases (invo
On 16 August 2012 08:42, Jan Grmela wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
> I'm pretty sure this should help you:
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class/lib/DBIx/Class/ResultSet.pm#cache
Not quite. What he's saying is, he wants $book->author to return the
author object that was supplied when he created the book
On 16 August 2012 12:21, Ian Docherty wrote:
...
> One technique I have seen used is as follows.
>
> my $author = $authors_rs->find(1);
> my $book = $books_rs->create({ author => $author, title => 'title' });
> $book->author($author);
>
> Be warned however, in some circumstances this can lead to c
On 20 September 2012 12:06, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> This is a describing a different problem froma thread a year ago. It is what
> happens when new rows are inserted *concurrently* with pos unspecified (i.e.
> pushed to the end of the stack)
Ah. I'd run into a similar problem with the unique key
I've used moniker_map in a few places, but before I realised I could use
it, I named a table cached_v_a_t_numbers to get the same effect :)
Do look at the inflect_{singular,plural} attributes too, if you're tweaking
the result source names you may want to tweak some of the accessor /
relation name
It would probably be more intuitive to return something like:
{
element => {
concept => { concept_id => nnn, foldername => 'xxx' },
...
},
...
}
?
I've a couple of similar queries that I wrote before I started using HRI
much, though I had to use +select/+as then get_c
On 22 February 2013 11:36, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> At first glance yes. The problem here is that you are incorrectly
> assuming that given 'concept.concept_id' one can simply infer we are
> talking about the 'concept' from join => { element => 'concept' }.
>
> However the moment *another* 'conc
You need the first arg to search there to be [ ... ] rather than { ... }.
On 15 April 2013 20:47, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
> I am meaning to run...
>
> search records where:
> if item_type='XX' _then_ item column should contain '%01par%' or
> '%01pqt%'
> and,
> if item_type='YY' OR
On 30 April 2013 19:21, Chris Newman wrote:
> I have a search like this:
>
> my $ids = [2, 1, 3];
>
> $schema->resultset (‘MyTable’)->search (id => $ids);
>
>
>
> MySQL processes rows in the order they are found in the table so I
> essentially get back 1, 2, 3. $ids is really a user-specified li
Same here. Is there a cookie problem?
On 12 July 2013 20:51, Darren Duncan wrote:
> On 2013.07.12 8:44 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>>
>> I wrote a relatively long meditation on the merits and demerits of my
>> continuous involvement with this project:
>>
>>
>> http://blogs.perl.org/users/peter_rab
Copy your lib/MyApp/Model/DB.pm (or whatever it's called), and in the
second copy, add the mysql_enable_utf8 => 1 to __PACKAGE__->config( {
... } ); or add it in your myapp.conf under the new model name.
On 16 January 2014 11:06, Dave Howorth wrote:
> Is there a good (authoritative?) description
On 2 April 2014 10:47, RAPPAZ Francois wrote:
> I'm struggling with code as
...
> my ($where, @bind)= $sqlmaker->where("ti, ex, ad", "tri", $bla);
> $self->{log}->debug($where);
> my $rs = $self->{schema}->resultset('Jrn')->search_rs(undef,
> {where=> $where});
Couple of things
On 3 April 2014 13:37, RAPPAZ Francois wrote:
> Is it the way I'm calling using the sqlmaker object ?
It occurs to me that DBIC is cheerfully calling into sqlfairy behind
the scenes and turning your already-formatted SQL into its own where
clause. Maybe try:
->search( \[ $sql, @binds ] )
__
On 4 April 2014 15:27, RAPPAZ Francois wrote:
> I tried
...
> my $rs = $self->{schema}->resultset('Jrn')->search_rs(undef, { -and => [
> \["WHERE match(ti, ex, ad) against(? in boolean mode)", @b]], order_by =>
> 'tri'});
Take out the "undef, " -- you've passed the query as the second paramete
Set the default value to be \'CURRENT_TIMESTAMP'
On 17 April 2014 13:37, Adam Witney wrote:
>
>>> Great thanks,
>>>
>>> on_connect_do => "SET datestyle = 'sql, mdy'",
>>>
>>> did the trick
>>
>> mea culpa! You should use on_connect_call => 'datetime_setup' which does
>> the right thing for ever
$users->search (
[
{ 'user_friends.user_id' => $id },
{ 'user_friends.friend_user_id' => $id }
], {
join => 'user_friends'
}
)->all
On 10 June 2014 12:18, Mitchell Elutovich wrote:
> For a customer result source, I know we can do something such as:
>
> $new_source->name( \< ( SELECT
$schema->resultset('User')->search({GroupId => 712})->delete;
On 28 August 2014 13:01, Sheeju Alex wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any way in DBIx to delete all rows from resultset in a single
> query, it looks like delete and delete_all will delete the resultset row by
> row.
>
> my $rs = $sch
DELETE FROM User WHERE Id = 3;
>
>
> and so on
>
> So if we have 100 Users it would 201 (1 + 100 + 100) queries.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Sheeju Alex
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Will Crawford
> wrote:
>>
>> $schema->resultset('User
On 11 February 2015 at 21:58, Ekki Plicht (DF4OR) wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to check a list of values if they exist in a database. The
> value is a unique key of that table. A stupid 'find' works of course,
> but returns the whole row data, where I only need a simple binary
> yes/no information if a r
You _should_ just be able to subclass the HRI class and add those methods
(and pass { result_class => 'My::HRI::Subclass' } in for the RS
attributes). I haven't tested this, will do in a moment :)
On 9 April 2015 at 14:58, Lasse Makholm wrote:
> I'm using DBIx::Class::ResultClass::HashRefInflato
my $self = shift;
return { %$self };
}
}
my $users = $schema->resultset('User');
my $me = $users->find( $my_user_id, {
result_class => 'My::HRI::Subclass'
} );
Dwarn $me->TO_JSON;
On 9 April 2015 at 16:00, Lasse Makholm wrote:
>
>
> On Th
Ignore me, -EINSUFFICIENTCAFFEINE. Of course you need to class the returned
objects ...
On 9 April 2015 at 15:57, Will Crawford wrote:
> You _should_ just be able to subclass the HRI class and add those methods
> (and pass { result_class => 'My::HRI::Subclass' } in for the
{ data_type => "integer[]", ... }
works for me?
On 7 May 2015 at 10:17, Adam Sjøgren wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a Postgres database with some fields that are defined as arrays
> in the database.
>
> When I insert new rows where the field has a Perl-array as the value,
> DBIx::Class+DBD::Pg a
I'd create some sort of proxy object that stores a ref to $schema and does
the ->dbh_do magic behind the scenes whenever you call a method on it ...
On 26 September 2015 at 18:23, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Peter Rabbitson
> wrote:
>
>
>> Is there any problem wit
On 15 October 2015 at 11:13, Will Crawford wrote:
[stupid top-post elided]
Sorry about that.
___
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class
This is because you are using sqlite. You could be intending to call
->deploy() rather than trying to select data. Sqlite will create the
file for you (complete with typo) in this case. But as you haven't
created any tables in the alternately-spelt database file, you'll get
an exception.
On 14 Oct
If it's a third-party product ID (which the "known from" suggests), or
it's non-unique for other reasons, having it named just "id" is
misleading at best :)
Maybe go with something like "their_id"?
On 29 November 2017 at 11:39, Vladimir Melnik wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> That's why I can't decide sh
A visit to https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=dbix+select+distinct should
answer your question:
DBIx::Class::Manual::Cookbook (first result here) says:
SELECT DISTINCT with multiple columns
...
my $rs = $schema->resultset('Artist')->search(
{},
{
columns => [ qw/artist_id name rank
41 matches
Mail list logo
