On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:02:16PM +0100, Colin Newell wrote:
> I think it might be worth going back to frew's suggestion of the
> Collective Code Construction Contract and think about whether we can
> try to adopt the risk management into the general governance of the
> project. We all seem to ag
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:54:47AM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Peter Rabbitson [2016-10-11 17:28]:
> > Additionally stability on its own isn't tangible, nor does it yield
> > a final product. It is simply a mindset. When this mindset is not
> > represented in the group as a whole, it mak
>
> Does it need to be a single person? Could it be a team responsibility like
> a Toyota-style "Stop the Line" button? I think a community can decide how it
> wants to mechanically run a stop process.
>
> The important thing – if stability is truly important – is making sure that
> people with th
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis
wrote:
> The position of a czar is reactive and disempowered. They can only fire-
> fight individual issues as the project hurtles forward headlong.
>
> If you want real security or actual good design, it must be part of the
> culture: it must
* Peter Rabbitson [2016-10-11 17:28]:
> Additionally stability on its own isn't tangible, nor does it yield
> a final product. It is simply a mindset. When this mindset is not
> represented in the group as a whole, it makes no difference whatsoever
> whether a small part of said group is advocatin
