[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000194]: Delivery to /dev/null through pipe makes zombies

2005-04-13 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=194 == Reported By:levgil Assigned

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000194]: Delivery to /dev/null through pipe makes zombies

2005-04-13 Thread Paul J Stevens
Try: !/dev/null in stead of |/dev/null Or if you *must* use a pipe: '|cat /dev/null' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=194

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000195]: autoconf detection of ldap headers and libraries fails on netbsd

2005-04-13 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=195 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

RE: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000194]: Delivery to /dev/null through pipe makes zombies

2005-04-13 Thread Jesse Norell
In database table dbmail-aliases i have an e-mail alias whith field delivery_to=|/dev/null When I send to this e-mail one of dbmail-lmtpd children became zombie and message stays in queue. At one time in console appear message: sh: line 1: /dev/null: Permission denied /dev/null has

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000196]: Yahoo messages fail to insert into database

2005-04-13 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=196 == Reported By:mrbarletta

Re: [Dbmail] User receiving duplicates in DBmail.

2005-04-13 Thread Simon
Sri Gupta wrote: One of my users is complaining about recieving duplicates. Hes one of the on-to-it ones :), so its not a config error on his side or anything. Can anyone rule out dbamil here? Is this a amavis problem? Thanks. Headers for emails below: HEADER 1:--- Received:

Re: [Dbmail] User receiving duplicates in DBmail.

2005-04-13 Thread Sri Gupta
Sorry, I'm a moron, grep your logs for once. The error I had was Message may be delivered more than once, and it was an amavis timeout problem with stale childs. -Sri On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:15:42PM +1200, Simon wrote: Hmm.. no mention of 'twice' in any of the logs. I am currently having a

Re: [Dbmail] User receiving duplicates in DBmail.

2005-04-13 Thread Simon
Sri Gupta wrote: Sorry, I'm a moron, grep your logs for once. The error I had was Message may be delivered more than once, and it was an amavis timeout problem with stale childs. -Sri On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:15:42PM +1200, Simon wrote: Hmm.. no mention of 'twice' in any of the logs. I

Re: [Dbmail] User receiving duplicates in DBmail.

2005-04-13 Thread Sri Gupta
I almost feel stupid sharing this, because it's a kludge of the worst kind. I'm too lazy to see what's actually wrong so I'm throwing voodoo and hoping it works itself out. In this case, it's a working kludge, but I still don't like it. I'm delivering mail to amavis from postfix using lmtp, and

Re: [Dbmail] Still having 'user unknown messages'

2005-04-13 Thread Paul J Stevens
Jesse Norell wrote: Apr 11 09:52:51 portero dbmail/smtp[3805]: pipe.c, insert_messages: temporary failure sort_and_deliver for useridnr [49] So, dbmail actually detects a temp-failure. As expected. Good. This sounds somewhat/exactly like another bug from not terribly long ago (I think

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-util crash during migration to 2.1.0

2005-04-13 Thread Paul J Stevens
Florian Weber wrote: On Sunday 10 April 2005 09:06, Paul J Stevens wrote: Could you test inserting that message yourself. Given that insertion uses the exact same code as a cache update in dbmail-util, it should crash as Insertion with /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] -m

Re: [Dbmail] Still having 'user unknown messages'

2005-04-13 Thread Humberto Valiente
Hello Paul I own you my excerpt I will send it today. regards, hvg Jesse Norell wrote: Apr 11 09:52:51 portero dbmail/smtp[3805]: pipe.c, insert_messages: temporary failure sort_and_deliver for useridnr [49] So, dbmail actually detects a temp-failure. As expected. Good. This sounds

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-util crash during migration to 2.1.0

2005-04-13 Thread Florian Weber
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:38, Paul J Stevens wrote: So this may well be a bug in gmime2.1 or even documented changed behaviour. The problem ist still present with gmime from current CVS. Should I talk to the gmime folks about it or would you rather do it yourself? -- With best regards,

[Dbmail] Virtual domain alias - dbmail - postfix

2005-04-13 Thread Matt Salerno
Postfix - 2.1.5 MySQL - 4.0.24 DBMail - 2.0.4 I have everything working almost ok, but now I have the need to add domain aliases. ex. foo.com is a virtual domain configured with lots of users My company decides that they want to buy foo.net and receive e-mail for both domains. So, [EMAIL

Re: [Dbmail] Virtual domain alias - dbmail - postfix

2005-04-13 Thread Leander Koornneef
Hi Matt, you can use the postfix recipient_canonical table for this: main.cf: recipient_canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_canonical /etc/postfix/recipient_canonical; @foo.net@foo.com Don't forget to postmap the file afterwards :-) regards, Leander On 13 Apr 2005,

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-util crash during migration to 2.1.0

2005-04-13 Thread Paul J Stevens
Florian Weber wrote: On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:38, Paul J Stevens wrote: So this may well be a bug in gmime2.1 or even documented changed behaviour. The problem ist still present with gmime from current CVS. Should I talk to the gmime folks about it or would you rather do it yourself?

[Dbmail] User receiving duplicates in DBmail.

2005-04-13 Thread M. J. [Mike] O'Brien
Where I have had this occur there was one or more of: * Duplicate aliases in the user's account * An alias plus a forward pointing to the same box * Amavis or other pass-through/forwarder config issue best... Mike - Original Message - From: Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dbmail@dbmail.org

[Dbmail] 550 Administrative prohibition

2005-04-13 Thread Matthew Frederico
I keep getting this: 550 Administrative prohibition every time I try to send a message to my exim+dbmail setup. I've hunted high and low for an answer for this, I've scoured the mailing lists, and still have found nothing. My exim logs show that it just rejects the message: 2005-04-13