Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-26 Thread Reindl Harald
de 2014 21:31 To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version yes! [root@mail:~]$ rpm -q dbmail dbmail-3.1.16- 5.fc19.20140721.rh.69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c.x86_64 [root@mail:~]$ systemctl status dbmail

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-25 Thread Paul J Stevens
, -Original Message- From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald Sent: quinta-feira, 24 de Julho de 2014 21:31 To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version yes! [root@mail

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi Harald, So how is this, problem solved? -Original Message- From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Harald Leithner Sent: terça-feira, 22 de Julho de 2014 08:39 To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-24 Thread Reindl Harald
? -Original Message- From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Harald Leithner Sent: terça-feira, 22 de Julho de 2014 08:39 To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version Runs fine

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
...@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald Sent: quinta-feira, 24 de Julho de 2014 21:31 To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version yes! [root@mail:~]$ rpm -q dbmail dbmail-3.1.16- 5.fc19.20140721.rh

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-22 Thread Harald Leithner
Runs fine for me, no customer complains since yesterday \o/ Am .07.2014, 17:56 Uhr, schrieb Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, you think we're ready for 3.1.17? On 21-07-14 17:10, Reindl Harald wrote: 69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c looks

[Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Reindl Harald
CLEAN - snapshot: a3f2972ed0f3f4d16fed27418c2013c6094533ab.tar.bz2 _ BROKEN: 8c612adbe6468e2cb4d520789cd35156145c5f37 support wrapped boundaries during reconstruction there must be happening something bad in memory that is the guilty commit

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Paul J Stevens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok. I'm putting gmime back in charge of parsing for boundaries. Currently testing the change. On 21-07-14 15:42, Reindl Harald wrote: CLEAN - snapshot: a3f2972ed0f3f4d16fed27418c2013c6094533ab.tar.bz2

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Reindl Harald
69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c looks way better * high concurrency * loop of 3000 times Panel: E-Mail-Debug - IMAP-POP3-Download with POP3 and IMAP with no mismatch between both * checksum of all testmessages for POP3 and IMAP correct * see also attachment not sure if the conlusion

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Paul J Stevens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, you think we're ready for 3.1.17? On 21-07-14 17:10, Reindl Harald wrote: 69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c looks way better * high concurrency * loop of 3000 times Panel: E-Mail-Debug - IMAP-POP3-Download with POP3 and IMAP with no

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Reindl Harald (mobile)
@dbmail.org Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND - Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, you think we're ready for 3.1.17? On 21-07-14 17:10, Reindl Harald wrote: 69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c looks way better * high concurrency