[Please excuse duplication]
*First RDA Vocabularies Published*
The Joint http://www.rda-jsc.org/ http://www.rda-jsc.org/Steering
http://www.rda-jsc.org/ http://www.rda-jsc.org/Committee
http://www.rda-jsc.org/ http://www.rda-jsc.org/for
http://www.rda-jsc.org/
Thomas,
That's exactly the point of the RDA vocabularies. See:
http://dlib.org/dlib/january10/hillmann/01hillmann.html and
http://metadataregistry.org/rdabrowse.htm
Diane
On 2/11/11 10:49 AM, Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote:
Is it a fair assumption to make that while encoding standards are
Folks:
The DCMI/RDA TG met on the Friday of DC-2010 (Oct. 22, 2010), with
roughly 25 attendees together for roughly an hour and 45 minutes.
Gordon and I had both prepared slides for the meeting, covering the
history and work of the task group, what had been learned by the TG,
what remained
Ed:
Gordon's slides start at slide #47:
http://www.slideshare.net/smartbroad/dcmirda-task-group-report-dc2010-pittsburgh
Diane
On 11/23/10 12:13 PM, Ed Summers wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Diane I. Hillmannd...@cornell.edu wrote:
Ed All:
Apologies, it was a link to the non-published google doc where the text
of the report originated, which didn't show up to me when I cut pasted
it into an empty mail document. All these applications trying to help
us, and they just screw us up!
The only relevant URL in that
This issue represents (to me, anyway) an excellent example of why we
need to look at approaches that are not record-based if we want to move
forward. If we start thinking that 'we can't use RDA because it won't
let us do provider neutral records' we're shooting ourselves in the
foot, in my
It seems to me that the assumption here that the textual guidance
(rules) are the place for these kinds of decisions, and that they should
necessarily apply to everyone is something we should be looking closely
at. In fact, if we're no longer thinking of catalog cards as our
preferred
Folks:
I'd like to point those of you interested in the more technical side of
discussions on RDA and FRBR to a conversation going on in the public
Linked Library Data discussion list, starting here with a message from
Karen Coyle:
++
JOIN US FOR DC-2010 IN PITTSBURGH!
The Organizing Committee of DC-2010 has published the final program for the
conference athttp://www.asis.org/Conferences/DC2010/program.html. DC-2010 is being
held in Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 20-22 October 2010 and is collocated with
Chris:
There was supposed to be a map of RDA to DC issued with the first
release of RDA, but I think the decision was made not to put it out
quite yet. I got a chance to look at it and provide some comments--in
general my comments were designed to eliminate the leaps of faith
endemic in the
Folks:
Some of you who attended ALA Midwinter may have heard me talk about an
upcoming article in DLib Magazine about the development of the RDA
Vocabularies. It's out now, and available at:
http://dlib.org/dlib/january10/hillmann/01hillmann.html:
Abstract
The Resource Description and
Hot off the projector:
http://www.slideshare.net/smartbroad/introduction-to-application-profiles
Diane Hillmann
Folks:
The vocabulary portions of RDA are essentially complete and available
at: http://metadataregistry.org/rdabrowse.htm. Updates to the
vocabularies from the last JSC meeting in March have been integrated,
and although we expect to see some minor editorial tweaks prior to the
formal
Antony:
There is indeed, and you cleverly used one of the several available.
You can see by viewing here:
http://metadataregistry.org/history/show/id/3396.html that the typo is
now fixed.
However, the easiest (we hope) method is just to click the feedback
button that appears on every
As some of you know, the RDA registrars have been working with the
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek to enable a German language translation of
the RDA elements and vocabularies to be available using the same
mechanism as the English original. Today, Veronika Leibrecht, who's
been working on this,
An important note on an ALA program ...
Diane
Original Message
Subject:[CODE4LIB] Linked Data program at ALA Annual Conference
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:39:34 -0400
From: Jennifer Bowen jbo...@library.rochester.edu
Reply-To: Code for Libraries
Hi, Jonathan,
Two points as you search out a solution:
1. I agree with your assessment of the current RDA carrier vocabulary.
You might want to look at the RDA/ONIX vocabularies (still not
registered, but there are plans to do so:
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/dunsire/01dunsire.html).
:16:19 -0500
From: Diane I. Hillmann d...@cornell.edu
Reply-To: List for discussion on Resource Description and Access (RDA)
DC-RDA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
To: DC-RDA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Folks:
Three new and important vocabularies from RDA have been registered:
RDA Content Type: http
that there will be once IFLA completes the
registration of the FRBR entities and relationships.
Regards,
Diane
*
Diane I. Hillmann
Director of Metadata Initiatives
Information Institute of Syracuse
Partner, Metadata Management Associates
Website: http://managemetadata.org http
Jakob:
I'm glad you're interested in RDA and think it's a step in the right
direction. I'd like to update you on a few issues you mention in your
post, however, which I hope will reassure you a bit.
Jakob Voss wrote:
Hi,
As you may already noticed the Resource Description and Access (RDA)
Folks:
As a result of some requests for additional cataloger scenarios, I've
added a new one [no. 6] on the DCMI/RDA Task Group wiki.
[http://dublincore.org/dcmirdataskgroup/]. Feel free to take a look and
comment, criticize, etc. I've taken a liberal view of what might be
useful for this
Karen:
I agree that the transcription issue is an issue that cries out for a
solution that looks clearly at the need we're attempting to fulfill, and
proposes a solution that meets that need yet doesn't require the human
effort we've traditionally thrown at it. When you think of the rules
Thomas:
The RDA value vocabularies are being registered and URIs assigned using
the NSDL Registry (http://metadataregistry.org). You can see a number
of the vocabularies registered there already, as well as a number of the
elements. If you browse vocabularies and schemas you should find them
Karen:
I like the idea of consolidating these small general vocabularies into
one, and enable the use for all of the places where appropriate. How
they are selected and whether they're appropriate for one category of
material and not for another should be specified in the definition and
24 matches
Mail list logo
