From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:52:46 -0300
Hi David,
Please consider pulling from:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.23
All looks great, pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 6/11/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Ian McDonald:
| --- a/net/dccp/dccp.h
| +++ b/net/dccp/dccp.h
| @@ -421,6 +421,11 @@ static inline suseconds_t timeval_delta(
| return secs * USEC_PER_SEC + usecs;
| }
|
| +static inline s64 ktime_delta(ktime_t later,
| Agree with Gerrit's comments in patchset description that there is
| still discussion around this. Still doing something is better than
| doing nothing.
Also agree with what you are saying. This is really why I would like
to get the experimental test tree for DCCP/CCID3 started soon.
With
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| The name was chosen for consistency with timeval_delta(), which is the
current
| function for microsecond time differences in net/dccp/dccp.h.
|
| I'm going to rename ktime_delta() to ktime_us_delta(), as it receives
| two ktime_t values, but returns a
Thanks for the update.
Just for information - I will be updating all my patches based on this set of
10, as I expect them to be in David Miller's tree soon.
If people would like me to resubmit the updates, please give me a shout as I
will otherwise prepare these updates for the test tree.
On 6/16/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| The name was chosen for consistency with timeval_delta(), which is the
current
| function for microsecond time differences in net/dccp/dccp.h.
|
| I'm going to rename ktime_delta() to ktime_us_delta(),
On 6/16/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the update.
Just for information - I will be updating all my patches based on this set of
10, as I expect them to be in David Miller's tree soon.
If people would like me to resubmit the updates, please give me a shout as I
will
On 6/16/07, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| The name was chosen for consistency with timeval_delta(), which is the
current
| function for microsecond time differences in
On 6/16/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| I am going to change that in my tree as well, since I am busy updating
with regard
| to most recent changes anyway.
|
| I just checked with Thomas Gleixner, the ktime_t guy and he is ok with
| adding
On 6/11/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Ian McDonald:
| This looks OK but...
| -static void ccid3_hc_tx_update_x(struct sock *sk, struct timeval *now)
| +static void ccid3_hc_tx_update_x(struct sock *sk, ktime_t *stamp)
|
| I don't see callers updated. Is this what you
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| We'll have to avoid it, I'm looking at how to do it...
|
|
| I'm just stuck with t_ld not having being converted to ktime_t, so
| I'll fix this up by...
|
| - hctx-ccid3hctx_t_ld = now;
| +
On 6/16/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
| We'll have to avoid it, I'm looking at how to do it...
|
|
| I'm just stuck with t_ld not having being converted to ktime_t, so
| I'll fix this up by...
|
| - hctx-ccid3hctx_t_ld = now;
| +
| OK, but doing the simple ktime_to_timeval above I was able to merge
| something that moves us further, its clear and self contained, so I
| loved it and merged.
Oh, sorry - I think I misunderstood you. Yes, of course, I was talking
experimental tree and didn't exactly know what you were
On 6/11/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[CCID 3]: Shorten statement for updating p
This shortens the statement for updating the loss event
rate p when a feedback packet is received.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c |7 ++-
1 file
On 6/10/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[CCID3]: Ignore trivial amounts of elapsed time
This patch fixes a previously undiscovered bug:
* the receive timestamp is taken when the skb enters the CCID3 module;
* RFC 4342 requires to send an Elapsed Time estimate to the sender;
* the
On 6/10/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[DCCP]: Simplify interface of dccp_sample_rtt
Don't quite understand this yet but that's just me needing to look at
longer I think!!
+extern u32dccp_sample_rtt(struct sock *sk, long candidate);
What's candidate? Do you mean delta
On 6/12/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[TFRC]: Add history query/lookup function
This completes the basic TX history functions that are implemented by this
patch set, by adding a lock-protected lookup function to look up the send
time of a particular sent packet.
I notice there is
On 6/12/07, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[CCID3]: Update TX RTT sampling to use ktime_t
Using the new TX history interface (which looks up send time in ktime_t units),
the
CCID3 sender side is now upgraded to use the ktime_t interface for sampling RTT
values.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit
18 matches
Mail list logo
