Re: [RFC][PATCHES 0/7]: Reorganization of RX history patches

2007-12-03 Thread Ian McDonald
On 12/3/07, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WARNING: After reading some messages from Ingo Molnar on lkml I think we should really trim the number of lists we use for kernel development. And since I moved back to using mutt for reading e-mails, something

[PATCH 3/6] [CCID3]: Hook up with new RX history interface

2007-12-03 Thread Gerrit Renker
In addition, it makes two corrections too the code: 1. The receiver of a half-connection does not set window counter values; only the sender sets window counters [RFC 4342, sections 5 and 8.1]. 2. The computation of X_recv does currently not conform to TFRC/RFC 3448, since this

[PATCH 5/6] [TFRC]: Ringbuffer to track loss interval history

2007-12-03 Thread Gerrit Renker
A ringbuffer-based implementation of loss interval history is easier to maintain, allocate, and update. Details: * access to the Loss Interval Records via macro wrappers (with safety checks); * simplified, on-demand allocation of entries (no extra memory consumption on lossless links); cache

Re: [RFC][PATCHES 0/7]: Reorganization of RX history patches

2007-12-03 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:35:12AM +, Gerrit Renker escreveu: Hi Arnaldo, hank you for going through this. I have just backported your recent patches of 2.6.25 to the DCCP/CCID4/Faster Restart test tree at git://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/dccp_exp {dccp,ccid4,dccp_fr} as per

Re: [Announce]: Test tree up{dated,loaded}

2007-12-03 Thread Leandro Sales
2007/12/3, Gerrit Renker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have just backported the latest changes that Arnaldo put in the 2.6.25 tree to the test tree. While it seems correct, I have not run exhaustive tests, but will run a few. I have also updated the CCID4/Faster Restart branches with regard to these

Re: [RFC][PATCHES 0/7]: Reorganization of RX history patches

2007-12-03 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:49:47PM +, Gerrit Renker escreveu: | Are you suggesting using netdev exclusively or in addition to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Well, since at least one person that has contributed significantly in | the past has said he can't cope with traffic on netdev, we can CC

Re: [RFC][PATCHES 0/7]: Reorganization of RX history patches

2007-12-03 Thread Gerrit Renker
| | static inline void ccid3_hc_rx_update_s(struct ccid3_hc_rx_sock *hcrx, int len) | | { | | if (likely(len 0))/* don't update on empty packets (e.g. ACKs) */ | | hcrx-ccid3hcrx_s = tfrc_ewma(hcrx-ccid3hcrx_s, len, 9); | |