On 10/12/07, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [DCCP]: Introducing CCMPS
>
> This introduces a CCMPS field for setting a CCID-specific upper bound on the 
> application payload
> size, as is defined in RFC 4340, section 14.
>
> Only the TX CCID is considered in setting this limit, since the RX CCID 
> generates comparatively
> small (DCCP-Ack) feedback packets. The CCMPS field includes network and 
> transport layer header
> lengths. The only current CCMPS customer is CCID4 (via RFC 4828).
>
> A wrapper is used to allow querying the CCMPS even at times where the CCID 
> modules may not have
> been fully negotiated yet.
>
> In dccp_sync_mss() the variable `mss_now' has been renamed into `cur_mps', to 
> reflect that we are
> dealing with an MPS, but not an MSS.
> Since the DCCP code closely follows the TCP code, the identifiers 
> `dccp_sync_mss' and
> `dccps_mss_cache' have been kept, as they have direct TCP counterparts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to