Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

Sorry for the late answer. I had to re-install dealii + trilinos. jomivalen@Nalia ~/cfem/trilinos/lib $ ldd libepetra.so.12.6.2 | grep mpi libmpi_cxx.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.1 (0x7fb4ac8f7000) libmpi.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmpi.so.1 (0x7fb4ac576000) jomivalen@Nalia

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

On 11/09/2016 03:52 PM, 'Joaquin M Valencia Bravo' via deal.II User Group wrote: In case of trilinos, I followed the next steps: $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_Sacado=ON \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_MueLu:BOOL=ON \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_Stratimikos=ON

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

Apparently I used the MPI by default for both of them. In case of trilinos, I followed the next steps: $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_Sacado=ON \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_MueLu:BOOL=ON \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_Stratimikos=ON \

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

Apparently I used the same MPI by default for both of them. In case of trilinos, I followed the next steps: $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_Sacado=ON \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_MueLu:BOOL=ON \ -DTrilinos_ENABLE_Stratimikos=ON \

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

On 11/09/2016 03:44 PM, 'Joaquin M Valencia Bravo' via deal.II User Group wrote: cmake \ -D Trilinos_ENABLE_Sacado=ON \ -D Trilinos_ENABLE_MueLu:BOOL=ON \ -D Trilinos_ENABLE_Stratimikos=ON \ -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RELEASE \ -D CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-g -O3" \

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

Apparently I used the same MPI by default for both of them. In case of trilinos, I followed the next steps: $ mkdir build $ cd build $ cmake \ -D Trilinos_ENABLE_Sacado=ON \ -D Trilinos_ENABLE_MueLu:BOOL=ON \ -D Trilinos_ENABLE_Stratimikos=ON \ -D

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

On 11/09/2016 03:30 PM, 'Joaquin M Valencia Bravo' via deal.II User Group wrote: I understand, but I don't know how to compile both of them with the same version. Could you please tell me the steps to do that? Well, how did you compile the two before? :-) Presumably you used some way to tell

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

I understand, but I don't know how to compile both of them with the same version. Could you please tell me the steps to do that? Thanks for your time, Joaquin 2016-11-09 18:10 GMT-04:00 Wolfgang Bangerth : > On 11/09/2016 02:46 PM, 'Joaquin M Valencia Bravo' via deal.II

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

On 11/09/2016 02:46 PM, 'Joaquin M Valencia Bravo' via deal.II User Group wrote: Which version of trilinos may I use in my case?. I followed the instructions on page: https://www.dealii.org/8.4.1/external-libs/trilinos.html although, it was for trilinos-12.0.1. Should I use the same

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

12.4.x is probably tested the most, but 12.6.x should also work. On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM, 'Joaquin M Valencia Bravo' via deal.II User Group wrote: > Thank you for your response: > > Which version of trilinos may I use in my case?. I followed the instructions > on

Re: [deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

Thank you for your response: Which version of trilinos may I use in my case?. I followed the instructions on page: https://www.dealii.org/8.4.1/external-libs/trilinos.html although, it was for trilinos-12.0.1. Should I use the same version?. What suggestions could you give me? Sincerely,

Re: [deal.II] Re: Question about Step 44 shape function gradient computations

Hi all, The attached pdf might be useful. There is some notational difference from step44, but it is defined here. Thanks, Anup On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Andrew McBride wrote: > Dear Claire > > You might also be interested in the one-field version of step-44

[deal.II] Re: Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 2:58:32 PM UTC-4, Joaquin wrote: > > Dear all, > > I hope someone help me. I want to run step-40, so I need trilinos and > petsc. First, I'm trying to interface trilinos-12.6.2 with deal.II-8.4.1. > My computer has a gnu 4.8.4 compiler. Everything is ok until

[deal.II] Interfacing dealii-8.4.1 with trilinos-12.6.2 - make test failed

Deal all, I hope someone help me. I want to run step-40, so I need trilinos and petsc. First, I'm trying to interface trilinos-12.6.2 with deal.II-8.4.1. My computer has a gnu 4.8.4 compiler. Everything is ok until the "make test". The five step failed. -- The deal.II project is located at

Re: [deal.II] Re: Question about Step 44 shape function gradient computations

Dear Claire You might also be interested in the one-field version of step-44 in the code gallery https://dealii.org/developer/doxygen/deal.II/code_gallery_Quasi_static_Finite_strain_Compressible_Elasticity.html A > On 9 Nov 2016, at 18:24, Claire wrote: > > Dear

Re: [deal.II] Re: Question about Step 44 shape function gradient computations

Dear Wolfgang and Jean-Paul, I will try to do my best to produce the document and give a contribution (even small) to the library. I am not sure when exactly I will be able to have time to make it though... The problem that I personally try to solve is simpler and does not require a three field

Re: [deal.II] I am trying to configure deal.II with mpi, and pass it to cmake as $cmake -DDEAL_II_WITH_MPI=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/dealII ../dealii-8.4.1/

> CMake Error at /usr/local/lib/cmake/Trilinos/TrilinosConfig.cmake:174 (LIST): > list sub-command REMOVE_DUPLICATES requires list to be present. This looks like cmake chokes on your Trilinos installation. It might be that your cmake version is too old. You could also try disabling trilinos or

Re: [deal.II] Re: Convergence problem arising for large number of DoFs

Hamed, Thanks for your help. I can reduce my problem to four 2D elements. I would > like to plot the system_matrix of sequential and parallel codes to compare > them but I am not sure how to do so. > Can I loop over the elements of system_matrix and simply plot them? > All of the matrix classes

Re: [deal.II] Re: Convergence problem arising for large number of DoFs

Dear Wolfgang, Thanks for your help. I can reduce my problem to four 2D elements. I would like to plot the system_matrix of sequential and parallel codes to compare them but I am not sure how to do so. Can I loop over the elements of system_matrix and simply plot them? Thanks -- The deal.II

[deal.II] Cluster with Infiniband network

Hello all, I am running a simulation of linear elasticity in the Lomonosov2 cluster (rank 41 in top 500) which has InfiniBand network. For problems larger than 90 million unknowns openmpi just aborts the program with this message [n49422:9059] *** An error occurred in MPI_Allreduce

Re: [deal.II] small issues with assembly

On 11/09/2016 08:24 AM, Ashkan Dorostkar wrote: void dealii::TrilinosWrappers::VectorBase::add(dealii::TrilinosWrappers::VectorBase::size_type, const size_type*, const double*) The violated condition was: !has_ghost_elements() The name and call sequence of the exception was:

Re: [deal.II] small issues with assembly

Here is a part of the stacktrace that shows where the issue arises An error occurred in line <1357> of file in function void dealii::TrilinosWrappers::VectorBase::add(dealii::TrilinosWrappers::VectorBase::size_type, const size_type*, const double*) The violated condition was: