Re: [deal.II] Re: Error with Transfinite Interpolation

I have to admit that I didn't read your code carefully enough to really understand how you did the coloring. Regardless, its probably fine: using a 2D approximation for a 2D calculation gets rid of the error in the example you provided :) On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Juan Carlos Araujo

[deal.II] Re: Error with Transfinite Interpolation

Thanks a lot for looking at this issue so quickly! No problem, you can use it. That was the idea of sharing the minimal example! I am always happy to contribute with the library. So, does this mean that the way I colorize is correct? if there is a better/simpler way plz let me know. Is the

[deal.II] Re: Error with Transfinite Interpolation

I figured it out: we have an optimization that assumes in one particular place that, if we have eight points, they must be the vertices of a cube. However, in 2D, we use eight points to place new points on quadrilaterals: assuming these are the vertices of a cube is wrong. The original

Re: [deal.II] Re: Parallel DoFRenumbering does not work on mac

Bruno, > This says that you have a problem with MPI. Your program died before >> executing any code in deal. Can you run other MPI codes? >> > Yes, I can run step-40 in parallel. This problem happens only after I added a DoFRenumbering call in it (step-40.cc originally does not call

Re: [deal.II] Re: Parallel DoFRenumbering does not work on mac

Jie, 2018-01-18 14:31 GMT-05:00 Jie Cheng : > Fatal error in MPI_Init_thread: Other MPI error, error stack: > MPIR_Init_thread(474): > MPID_Init(152)...: channel initialization failed > MPID_Init(426)...: PMI_Get_appnum returned -1 > [cli_0]: write_line error;

Re: [deal.II] Nedelec Elements and non-tangential Dirichlet data

Ignore my question about projection. Somehow I thought I remembered that the projection functions dont support nedelec elements in deal - my bad. Am Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 18:57:06 UTC+1 schrieb Pascal Kraft: > > Thanks for your fast reply! > About your first point: Yes, I currently use a

Re: [deal.II] Nedelec Elements and non-tangential Dirichlet data

Thanks for your fast reply! About your first point: Yes, I currently use a FeSystem composed of two 3D Nedelec fes. The second point I agree with you. Setting the additional values should not be a problem since I know the analytical solution of the problem so this should not be a problem

[deal.II] Re: Parallel DoFRenumbering does not work on mac

Jie, On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 11:17:55 AM UTC-5, Jie Cheng wrote: > > I found that DoFRenumbering with distributed dof_handler does not work on > my mac (Mac OS X 10.13.2). My dealii is built with PETSc and Step-40 runs > fine. But once I added DoFRenumbering::Cuthill_McKee(dof_handler)

[deal.II] Re: Error with Transfinite Interpolation

Hey there, I have some familiarity with the transfinite interpolation implementation and am looking into this now. It looks like, in the transformation, one of the 'reference cell points' is calculated as {20, 20}: I don't yet see why. I suspect that we now create a twisted cell (or something

[deal.II] Parallel DoFRenumbering does not work on mac

Hi all I found that DoFRenumbering with distributed dof_handler does not work on my mac (Mac OS X 10.13.2). My dealii is built with PETSc and Step-40 runs fine. But once I added DoFRenumbering::Cuthill_McKee(dof_handler) after dof_handler.distribute_dofs (fe), it gave me runtime error: