Re: [deal.II] Re: Electromagnetic Machine Simulation (Quasi-Poisson Equation in Multiple Domains) Setup

2019-06-04 Thread Earl Fairall
Dear Baoyun, I too have been looking at this exact application. Building the mesh in deal.ii is difficult. Deal.ii only has some very fundamental shapes which require the use of boolean operations for increased complexity. This in itself is not challenging. The challenge is that the mesh nodes

[deal.II] Re: Electromagnetic Machine Simulation (Quasi-Poisson Equation in Multiple Domains) Setup

2019-06-04 Thread Baoyun Ge
Hi Daniel Thanks for your prompt response and guidelines. After going through these examples, I have a better understanding now. Best, Baoyun On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 7:54:16 PM UTC-5, Daniel Arndt wrote: > > Bayon, > > What's the most appropriate/easiest way to setup the matrix for such a

Re: [deal.II] p4est balance_mesh

2019-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 6/4/19 6:41 AM, Gabriel Peters wrote: > > I am wondering, whether there is a deal.ii function, which balances a > parallel::distributed::triangulation neighbouring elements by 2:1, > like the p8est_balance_ext function > (see >

[deal.II] p4est balance_mesh

2019-06-04 Thread Gabriel Peters
Hey everyone, I am wondering, whether there is a deal.ii function, which balances a parallel::distributed::triangulation neighbouring elements by 2:1, like the p8est_balance_ext function (see http://p4est.github.io/api/p8est__extended_8h.html#ad3a61dc2b4b5cc69b03c995f188bfd8d ) Such a