Re: [deal.II] Augmented Lagrangian Method for Asymetric Stokes Problem

2019-06-25 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 6/24/19 3:59 AM, Félix Bunel wrote: > > Fortunately for me, the dealII doc has an answer for everything :-) > 1 - Is there a simpler way to solve my stokes problem than using a Schur > Preconditioner and the augmented lagrangian method ? There are plenty of simpler methods, such as just

Re: [deal.II] Re: NedelecSZ with adaptive mesh refinement

2019-06-25 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 6/25/19 11:55 AM, Daniel Garcia-Sanchez wrote: > According to Alexander Grayver, deal.II interface does not permit dynamic > constraints (that is, constraints, which depend on a cell orientation). This > problem does not seem easy to solve. That's only partly true. The

Re: [deal.II] Re: NedelecSZ with adaptive mesh refinement

2019-06-25 Thread Daniel Garcia-Sanchez
Bruno, On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 8:06:09 PM UTC+2, Bruno Turcksin wrote: > > > Yes, that's correct. The old Nedelec can be refined but I would trust > it only if you have rectangles/regular hex . > > In that case, I think that the old FE_Nedelec should be good for my application. Best,

Re: [deal.II] Re: NedelecSZ with adaptive mesh refinement

2019-06-25 Thread Bruno Turcksin
Daniel Le mar. 25 juin 2019 à 13:55, Daniel Garcia-Sanchez a écrit : > Thanks for the reference. Yes, it seems that this is a non-trivial problem. > Although from what I understand from the post. > > The new FE_NedelecSZ element can be used with complex meshes, but can not be > refined > The

[deal.II] Re: NedelecSZ with adaptive mesh refinement

2019-06-25 Thread Daniel Garcia-Sanchez
Bruno, On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 7:04:07 PM UTC+2, Bruno Turcksin wrote: > > > This post > > briefly discuss the problem. Apparently it is non-trivial but I can't > really comment on it (I've never used Nedelec element) >

[deal.II] Re: NedelecSZ with adaptive mesh refinement

2019-06-25 Thread Bruno Turcksin
Dani, On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 12:52:09 PM UTC-4, Daniel Garcia-Sanchez wrote: > > > That means that I can not do adaptive mesh refinement with NedelecSZ? > That's correct. > > If that is the case, I would be happy to contribute and make this element > compatible with adaptive mesh

[deal.II] NedelecSZ with adaptive mesh refinement

2019-06-25 Thread Daniel Garcia-Sanchez
Hi, I read in the documentation that the NedelecSZ element does not support non-conforming meshes at this time. That means that I can not do adaptive mesh refinement with NedelecSZ? If that is the case, I would be happy to contribute and make this element compatible with adaptive mesh

Re: [deal.II] Fwd: Regarding Step 60 tutorial of deal.ii

2019-06-25 Thread Daniel Garcia-Sanchez
On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 11:36:32 PM UTC+2, Ramprasad R wrote: > > Hello Bangerth, > > The terms N_* are the resultant forces in the * direction and these forces > are calculated using the strains which in turn are calculated using the > displacements u. So the terms N_* are not constants,