On 8/4/19 5:47 PM, Jonathan Russ wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply. The shape functions of the "quadratic" serendipity
> elements are very similar to the FE_Q(2) elements except they are derived
> without any interior nodes (i.e. in 2D the interior node is removed and the
> shape functions
Professor Bangerth -
Thank you for your reply. The shape functions of the "quadratic"
serendipity elements are very similar to the FE_Q(2) elements except they
are derived without any interior nodes (i.e. in 2D the interior node is
removed and the shape functions are simple polynomials with 8
> Oh yes, I actually did not assume my current way of doing things to work.
> After the static case was running, it was just a one liner (calling
> set_fe_indices() again in each timestep) which was a really naive way of
> doing
> things.
> The problem at the moment is, that I just change the
On 8/3/19 1:17 PM, Jonathan Russ wrote:
>
> How difficult would it be to add serendipity elements to dealii? They are
> very
> useful in solid mechanics applications and can greatly reduce the
> computational cost. Is it very difficult to add an element that is the same
> is
> FE_Q but
On 8/2/19 4:01 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
>
> considering the above scenario as well as the concerns, I would be grateful
> to
> receive any suggestion from your side. Hope I am clear in my description.
> Waiting for your kind response. Thank you in advance!
Instead of copying
On 8/2/19 10:57 PM, Phạm Ngọc Kiên wrote:
> I have tried with the sum of the right hand side, but as I think, it did not
> work for my problem.
I think I've made this kind of point on the mailing list before: You make it
sound like you tried something, but it didn't work even though it should
