Re: [deal.II] Re: Thermal Modelling of Additive Manufacturing Process

Certainly I didn't framed my question well but I got a thread concerning additive simulation so I will look into it and will let you know as I get stuck somewhere in future in the meantime thanks for a quick response. Regards Pushkar On Thu, Sep 3, 2020, 00:01 Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > Dear

Re: [deal.II] extract_dofs() extremely slow in for single-thread run?

I was close — it’s fe.get_unit_support_points() // https://www.dealii.org/developer/doxygen/deal.II/classFiniteElement.html#a5b35a290aa7dd7562911a92a13b11fee > Moreover, defining

Re: [deal.II] Re: Thermal Modelling of Additive Manufacturing Process

Dear Pushkar, Indeed, as Bruno said, it’s hard to understand what information you’re looking for. This can certainly be done with deal.II, as it’s a topic of research that my former colleague has been working on for some time:

Re: [deal.II] PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockVector with Direct Solverlkl9p00ppll0p00llĺo

Pp0p0o00090lpllloll Il Mer 2 Set 2020, 17:30 Wolfgang Bangerth ha scritto: > On 9/2/20 8:49 AM, mau@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I have read the documentation but I didn't find anything related to > using > > BlockVector from PETScWrappers with a Direct Solver, for instance > >

Re: [deal.II] PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockVector with Direct Solver

On 9/2/20 8:49 AM, mau@gmail.com wrote: I have read the documentation but I didn't find anything related to using BlockVector from PETScWrappers with a Direct Solver, for instance SolverPreOnly should work as a Direct Solver with PETScWrappers::PreconditionLU. In my serial code I used

[deal.II] PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockVector with Direct Solver

Hello to everyone, I have read the documentation but I didn't find anything related to using BlockVector from PETScWrappers with a Direct Solver, for instance SolverPreOnly should work as a Direct Solver with PETScWrappers::PreconditionLU. In my serial code I used SparseDirectUMFPACK, but it

[deal.II] Re: Thermal Modelling of Additive Manufacturing Process

Pushkar, What do you want to know? There is no question, so it's hard to help you. Best, Bruno On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 8:52:59 AM UTC-4 pushkar...@gmail.com wrote: > Greetings Deal.II Community, > > I wish to simulate the thermal profile in additive manufacturing process > using

[deal.II] Thermal Modelling of Additive Manufacturing Process

Greetings Deal.II Community, I wish to simulate the thermal profile in additive manufacturing process using inactivation element strategy .Moreover, as a prelude to such a simulation I wish to simulate the thermal model for welding first . So any help in this regard will be beneficial Thanks

Re: [deal.II] extract_dofs() extremely slow in for single-thread run?

I'm using FESystem for defining fe, and therefore I get "unit_support_points is protected within this context". Is there another way to get access to those points? Moreover, defining fe_values as const disables the reinit()-call, and I have to call cell->is_locally_owned(), instead of