Re: [deal.II] Using component mask to apply displacement boundary conditions

2022-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 9/18/22 06:51, Wasim Niyaz Munshi ce21d400 wrote: VectorTools::interpolate_boundary_values(dof_handler,                                                      1,  Functions::ConstantFunction(dim)(u_y_values,2),boundary_values,u_y_mask,                                                      

[deal.II] Using component mask to apply displacement boundary conditions

2022-09-18 Thread Wasim Niyaz Munshi ce21d400
Hello everyone. I am trying to specify x and y displacements separately in step 8 of the tutorial programs. I am doing it as follows: FEValuesExtractors::Scalar u_x(0); FEValuesExtractors::Scalar u_y(1); ComponentMask u_x_mask = fe.component_mask(u_x); ComponentMask u_y_mask =

Re: [deal.II] Re: matrix-free FEM for electromagnetic problem

2022-09-18 Thread 'yy.wayne' via deal.II User Group
Thank you Mr. Kronbichler. Looking forward to deal.II's development on matrix-free method. 在2022年9月18日星期日 UTC+8 15:07:17 写道: > At this moment, there is no support yet for Nedelec-type elements in the > matrix-free framework. However, I would expect these to get ready within > the next 2-3

Re: [deal.II] Re: matrix-free FEM for electromagnetic problem

2022-09-18 Thread Martin Kronbichler
At this moment, there is no support yet for Nedelec-type elements in the matrix-free framework. However, I would expect these to get ready within the next 2-3 months: We have recently added support for Raviart-Thomas elements, which have similar demands in terms of algorithms, therefore we