Dear Masoud,
> As you mentioned, we expect this to be slower than the equivalent code in
> step-8; however, it is very slower than the same code that I wrote before in
> Matlab.
A quick question: are you sure that you’re running your problem in release
mode, rather than debug mode? I had a
Dear Prof. Bangerth,
Thanks for your answer.
Indeed, I took the declaration of matrices out of the loop; but still, as I
mentioned, the part that is substantially reducing the speed is the product
between the matrices.
As you mentioned, we expect this to be slower than the equivalent code in
Masoud,
Here is a part of the tutorial code for example 8 to calculate stiffness
matrix of an element:
Screenshot 2021-10-15 at 12.48.39.png
And here is my equivalent code for the same purpose with a matrix-based
viewpoint:
Screenshot 2021-10-15 at 23.12.13.png
it is based on the
On 10/12/21 10:33 AM, Masoud Ahmadi wrote:
I'm trying to use a Matrix-based solution for a general 3D FE elastic
problem (just like example-8). In that example the authors used a linear
scaler solution for calculating the stiffness matrix of each element;
but, due to some reasons I want to
Dear all,
I'm trying to use a Matrix-based solution for a general 3D FE elastic
problem (just like example-8). In that example the authors used a linear
scaler solution for calculating the stiffness matrix of each element; but,
due to some reasons I want to use a matrix-based solution so that
