I just basically wanted to ensure that the code would work if there were
hanging nodes on the boundary but it looks like the deal.II library already
takes care of that; still your code could be useful if I decide to go down
that route so thanks!
On Thursday, 8 April 2021 at 15:35:32 UTC-4
Hi Stephen,
I know that Wolfgang has already answered you and has mentioned that having the
refinement levels differ across periodic interfaces is permitted. At some point
I wanted to ensure that they were identical, and I wrote a little function to
do that and have pasted it below just in
On 4/7/21 1:48 PM, Stephen wrote:
Thanks! I see they have mesh refinement in that tutorial. Maybe I
misunderstood the way periodicity constraints work in deal.II; is it the case
then that DoFTools::make_periodicity_constraints is able to automatically
handle meshes in which the cells on
Thanks! I see they have mesh refinement in that tutorial. Maybe I
misunderstood the way periodicity constraints work in deal.II; is it the
case then that DoFTools::make_periodicity_constraints is able to
automatically handle meshes in which the cells on periodic boundaries don't
necessarily
On 4/7/21 12:24 PM, Stephen wrote:
Has anyone here successfully implemented mesh refinement for problems with
(spatial) periodic boundary conditions before? If so, I'd welcome ideas on the
best way to approach the problem. As far as I can tell, it is a requirement in
deal.II for the elements
Hi all,
Has anyone here successfully implemented mesh refinement for problems with
(spatial) periodic boundary conditions before? If so, I'd welcome ideas on
the best way to approach the problem. As far as I can tell, it is a
requirement in deal.II for the elements on opposite sides of linked
