On 4/7/20 11:59 AM, A.Z Ihsan wrote:
Yes, thats what i want, just simply put the elastic anisotropy at the Gauss
point level.
step-6 already does that: It uses different material parameters depending on
the location of the quadrature point.
Best
W.
--
Hi Andrew,
Yes, thats what i want, just simply put the elastic anisotropy at the Gauss
point level.
Thank you for the answer.
Best,
Ihsan
On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 7:41:42 PM UTC+2, mac wrote:
>
> In the classical continuum approach to plasticity there is no grain
> boundary. The
In the classical continuum approach to plasticity there is no grain boundary.
The elastic anisotropy of the crystal is captured at the Gauss point level. So
you would start by associating different materials properties (elastic /
plastic) to Gauss points depending on their spatial location.
Hi Wolfgang,
alright, suppose i have a box that divided into two regions, and each
region has different elastic constant (anisotropy material).
Perhaps the idea is when calculating the cell_matrix, inside the for-loop
there is a function for choosing in which elastic constant to be used
On 4/7/20 2:30 AM, A.Z Ihsan wrote:
Would anyone give me a hint on how to implement the polycrystal problem, i.e.
more than one grain boundary?
I already have the tensor mechanics solver written in deal.ii, but now it
needs to be extended solveing also polycrystal problem.
Ihsan,
that's a
Hi,
Would anyone give me a hint on how to implement the polycrystal problem,
i.e. more than one grain boundary?
I already have the tensor mechanics solver written in deal.ii, but now it
needs to be extended solveing also polycrystal problem.
THank you.
Best,
ihsan
--
The deal.II project
