Similar question: How are the different loop-functions differentiated, i.e.
MeshWorker::integration_loop and MeshWorker::mesh_loop? Both are able to
loop over faces, boundaries and cells, but what are the differences here?
Thanks!
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2019 16:56:28 UTC+1 schrieb Bruno
Perfect, thanks!
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2019 16:56:28 UTC+1 schrieb Bruno Turcksin:
>
> Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 10:48, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group
> > a écrit :
> > I. e. if I would like to calculate f. ex. the L2-norm of a vector (while
> neglecting that there already is a function
Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 10:48, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group
a écrit :
> I. e. if I would like to calculate f. ex. the L2-norm of a vector (while
> neglecting that there already is a function for that), I can use WorkStream
> for parallelization of that, but not MeshWorker, is that
I. e. if I would like to calculate f. ex. the L2-norm of a vector (while
neglecting that there already is a function for that), I can use WorkStream
for parallelization of that, but not MeshWorker, is that correct?
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2019 16:40:42 UTC+1 schrieb Bruno Turcksin:
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
WorkStream can work using any iterator, i.e., you are not limited to cells.
MeshWorker is built on top of WorkStream and it is there to help you with
the assembly of your system. So if you want to use multithreading to
assemble your system, you probably want to use MeshWorker otherwise you
