[deal.II] Re: Resolving with different RHS

Thanks a lot!! On Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 1:21:37 PM UTC+3, Simon Sticko wrote: > > Hi, > a better option than computing the inverse is to factorize the matrix. > This can be done using the SparseDirectUMFPACK solver: > > >

[deal.II] Re: Resolving with different RHS

Hi, a better option than computing the inverse is to factorize the matrix. This can be done using the SparseDirectUMFPACK solver: https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classSparseDirectUMFPACK.html You might want to take a look at step 22, which uses this solver: