Thank you, Kristjan.
Both links are helpful.
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 1:10:36 PM UTC+2, krei wrote:
>
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> You can take a look at my project here:
> https://github.com/eimrek/dealii-field-currents-heating, perhaps it's
> useful. In currents_and_heating.h/.cc files I
Hello, Mike,
I have a similar problem like you. I have two PDEs in separate domains
coupled through an interface. I have also tried to solve this using
step-46.However, my code haven't produced the correct solution in my test
case. Thus, I am very interested to try new approaches, especially
Nice! Good luck with Gmsh!
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 11:10:46 AM UTC-4, krei wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response. I have a more-or-less working version where the
> whole thing is solved together by Newton's method, but I bet solving
> electric field separately gives a good performance
Thanks for the response. I have a more-or-less working version where the
whole thing is solved together by Newton's method, but I bet solving
electric field separately gives a good performance boost. I will try to
fiddle with it, however, generating multiple meshes with matching boundary
for
Hey,
I had a similar problem: PDES in separate domains that are coupled through
an interface as a boundary condition. You can go about it using one
triangulation; I attempted to do this at first, but ended up using multiple
meshes. The fact you have matching meshes on the boundary is good.
krei,
If your emission current boundary conditions do not depend linearly on the
electric field, the whole problem becomes non-linear and hence you can't
solve the whole problem directly.
What you can do is to first solve for the electric field and afterwards for
the metal part. In particular,
