[deal.II] Re: multiply constrained dofs (hanging nodes+periodic) fails a simple test case

2018-04-11 Thread Sambit Das
I understand my mistake now: there are extra hanging nodes constraints in the constraint matrix with (hanging nod constraints + PBC) compared to the constraint matrix with only hanging node constraints. That is why the minimal example fails. Sambit On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 1:00:25 PM

[deal.II] Re: multiply constrained dofs (hanging nodes+periodic) fails a simple test case

2018-04-11 Thread Denis Davydov
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 7:00:18 PM UTC+2, Sambit Das wrote: > > Hi Denis, > > >> I don't think that's the case. The domain is indeed periodic, but this is >> completely detached from location of support/nodal points. >> Same applies to geometry, you will have different coordinates of

[deal.II] Re: multiply constrained dofs (hanging nodes+periodic) fails a simple test case

2018-04-11 Thread Sambit Das
Hi Denis, > I don't think that's the case. The domain is indeed periodic, but this is > completely detached from location of support/nodal points. > Same applies to geometry, you will have different coordinates of vertices > across the PBC so > > I agree, the location of nodal points is