On 8/22/22 09:55, Uclus Heis wrote:
Would be also a poddible solution to export my testvec as it is right
now (which contains the global solution) but instead of exporting with
all the preocess, call the print function only for one process?
Yes. But that runs again into the same issue
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you very much for the suggestion.
Would be also a poddible solution to export my testvec as it is right now
(which contains the global solution) but instead of exporting with all the
preocess, call the print function only for one process?
Thank you
El El lun, 22 ago 2022 a
On 8/21/22 04:29, Uclus Heis wrote:
//
/testvec.print(outloop,9,true,false);/
It is clear that the problem I have now is that I am exporting the
completely_distributed_solution and that is not what I want.
Could you please informe me how to obtain the locally own solution? I
can not find the
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you for the clarifications.
I am trying now to export a file per process (and frequency) to avoid the
issue that I had (previously mentioned). However, What I get is a vector
with the total dof instead of the locally own dof.
My solver function is
*
On 8/19/22 14:25, Uclus Heis wrote:
"/That said, from your code, it looks like all processes are opening the same/
/file and writing to it. Nothing good will come of this. There is of course
also the issue that importing all vector elements to one process cannot scale
to large numbers of
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you very much for your answer. Regarding what you mentioned:
"*That said, from your code, it looks like all processes are opening the
same*
*file and writing to it. Nothing good will come of this. There is of
coursealso the issue that importing all vector elements to
On 8/19/22 03:25, Uclus Heis wrote:
/
/
The way of extracting and exporting the solution with
/testvec=locally_relevant_solution / is a bad practice? I am saving the
locally relevant solution from many different processes in one single file for
a given frequency. I am afraid that there is no
Dear all,
after some time I came back to this problem again. I would kindly ask for
some guidance to see if I can understand and solve the issue.
I am using a parallel::distributed::Triangulation with MPI. I call the
function solve() in a loop for different frequencies and want to export the
On 2/17/22 09:22, Uclus Heis wrote:
I still had problems as I first copy the array and then I store it in a matrix
for diffeerent frequencies.The result I got was differet whene using few
process compared to using 1 single process. I added the following code and now
works, is it right?
It
