[deal.II] How to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in step-40

2016-10-14 Thread Hamed Babaei
Hi friends, I want to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in my parallel code which is based on step-40. I guess some changes should be made in the following lines of the include files part: namespace LA { #if defined(DEAL_II_WITH_PETSC) && !(defined(DEAL_II_WITH_TRILINOS) &&

Re: [deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

2016-10-14 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 10/14/2016 12:45 PM, Timo Heister wrote: Documentation in the include part says : " uncomment the following #define > if you have PETSc and Trilinos installed and you prefer using Trilinos in > this example: #define FORCE_USE_OF_TRILINOS" > I can't understand what it means by the change in

Re: [deal.II] DWARF version?

2016-10-14 Thread Timo Heister
> The cmake aborts somewhere and I was trying to figure out where. I’m > attaching the log and the output. What is the output to the terminal before it aborts? -- Timo Heister http://www.math.clemson.edu/~heister/ -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing

[deal.II] Re: How to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in step-40

2016-10-14 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Hi Hamad, Can you please tell us which version of deal.II you are using, and provide us with the installation logs? Regards, J-P On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 11:51:09 PM UTC+2, Hamed Babaei wrote: > > Hi friends, > > I want to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in my parallel code which is based

[deal.II] Re: Solution Components of a Vector valued problem

2016-10-14 Thread Lisa Collins
Hallo, Thanks for both replies. In general, from a solution vector, how can I extract u_x, u_y, and T nodal values corresponding to a specific node? Best regards. Lisa On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 1:05:08 PM UTC+2, Lisa Collins wrote: > > Hello, > > Dealing with vector valued problems in

Re: [deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

2016-10-14 Thread Hamed Babaei
Hi Daniel, I hope you are doing well. I've been struggling to run step-40 using Trilinos instead of Petsc. I appreciate it if you could let me know which parts of the code should be changed and how. Documentation in the include part says : " uncomment the following #define if you have PETSc

Re: [deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

2016-10-14 Thread Timo Heister
> Documentation in the include part says : " uncomment the following #define > if you have PETSc and Trilinos installed and you prefer using Trilinos in > this example: #define FORCE_USE_OF_TRILINOS" > I can't understand what it means by the change in the following part: You only need to change