I'd like to use sacado package for automatic differentiation.
However, I have installed deal.ii on my computer with trilinos
configuration set off.
I looked back deal.ii installation manual and got to know that I have to
install trilnos package first.
However, when I try to install
Dear Daniel,
Please look at the pdf file attached. Thanks
On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 4:51:22 PM UTC-5, Daniel Arndt wrote:
>
> Hamed,
>
> At least I can't open your file in a way to clearly see what your
> bilinearform is, but could just guess from the implementation. Can you
> either
Hamed,
At least I can't open your file in a way to clearly see what your
bilinearform is, but could just guess from the implementation. Can you
either write it here (using LaTeX or similar) or upload the file as pdf
again?
Best,
Daniel
--
The deal.II project is located at
Hi Jean-Paul,
I wanted to verify that the issue that I encountered is not related to the
fact that I am using a version of dealii which is not the most updated one,
so I installed the current version of dealii from git. I run two versions
of my code with
Dear Wolfgang,
In attach you shall find the bilinear form and the assemble part of the
code as well.
Thanks,
On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 11:14:52 AM UTC-5, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
>
> > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 9:48:55 PM UTC-5, Wolfgang Bangerth
> wrote:
> >
> > What is
Hi Oded,
I wasn't able to read in the .cub file (clearly its not backwards
compatible). I did manage to import the .inp file and nothing looks amiss.
Could you try to set the apply_all_indicators_to_manifolds
Hoang,
I have some doubts over the contact algorithm used in step-41. Maybe someone
can help me to clarify:
+ In step-41, instead of solving for delta_U and delta_Lambda, we solve for
U_k+1 by using a finite difference equation. Is it some form of explicit
contact algorithm?
I'm not familiar
Dear Wolfgang,
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 9:48:55 PM UTC-5, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> What is the norm of the first right hand side? You now set the tolerance
> in
>
the first iteration to a fixed value of 1e-16, but how does this compare to
> the previous value of
Hi Oded,
Two things:
1. The documentation originally stated that "Files generated using Cubit
11.x, 12.x and 13.x are valid", but I see that its now been updated to
include 14.x and 15.x. I personally don't know whether this works with
newer versions of Cubit, but hopefully it has indeed been
Dear Hamed,
The problem here is that VectorTools::interpolate_boundary_values always
applied boundary values to surfaces in 3d, or lines in 2d. You cannot
directly apply point constraints using this function. What is happening
here is that you've set a component mask which says that for ALL of
10 matches
Mail list logo
