[deal.II] Re: Using constraints for already assembled RHS

2017-03-13 Thread RAJAT ARORA
Hello, I found out the solution and wanted to post here in case some one faces similar problem. In my case, the right hand side was already assembled and there was no way that it could be assembled during the calculations as done usually. Think of it as reading an assembled rhs (without

[deal.II] Interaction with the boundary description for a parallel distributed triangulation

2017-03-13 Thread 'Seyed Ali Mohseni' via deal.II User Group
Hi, I assume there is a mistake within the documentation of parallel::distributed::Triangulation class. Below the "detailed description" part within the second box there is written . Doesn't it have to be ? With regard to the same topic: I would like to know, if it is possible

Re: [deal.II] Re: Issue of extrude_triangulation for distributed mesh

2017-03-13 Thread zhaowenbo . npic
Bruno, Thanks. I am not clear about your method. The mesh with 4 cells is like below: A C D B Then A is refined 4 times, and will be with 16*16 cells. And now, B, C and D with 1 cells. How could I make C with 16*1 cells and D with 1*16 cells? BEST, Wenbo 在 2017年3月13日星期一

Re: [deal.II] Re: Issue of extrude_triangulation for distributed mesh

2017-03-13 Thread Bruno Turcksin
Wenbo, 2017-03-12 23:01 GMT-04:00 : > I am sorry. I should give my case more details. > The reactor core consists of 17*17 assembly, which consists of 17*17 fuel > pins. > If the material propeties, named cross sections, varies in assembly wise, > your solution is OK.