Re: [deal.II] Re: Run into a cluster

Hi Joaquin, Its been a really long time since I compiled Lapack manually and linked it against deal.II (at that time, before we used CMake). I've attached for you a file with my personal notes on how I used to compile Lapack then (circa 2012). I think that you've pretty much covered all of the

Re: [deal.II] imposing symmetric boundary conditions on the axis of symmetry of a 2D domain

Thanks, DeWitt. 在 2017年3月29日星期三 UTC+8上午1:50:16，Stephen DeWitt写道： > > In that case, you should just be able to use zero-flux boundary conditions > along the mirror plane. The way I typically picture it is that if you have > the same thing happening on either side of a mirror plane, you can't have

Re: [deal.II] possible Error of compute_no_normal_flux_constraints? Also: Manifolds vs. Boundaries

Felix, I think I ran into another bug here, but there is always the possibilty that I just tried to do something stupid. Therefore, before I post this on GitHub, I'd like someone who knows what he/she is doing to have a look at that. Outline of the Problem: Use Nedelec Elements to compute time-

Re: [deal.II] Re: Run into a cluster

Thanks for the help Jean-Paul. I installed lapack by myself, following the next steps: *$ wget http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapack-3.3.0.tgz $ tar zxvf lapack-3.3.0.tgz $ cp INSTALL/make.inc.gfortran make.inc $ make blaslib $ make lapacklib $

[deal.II] Fwd: {HaberPOSTA} - Fwd: Us congress hearing of maan alsaan Money laundry قضية الكونغجرس لغسيل الأموال للمليادير معن الصانع

YouTube videos of U.S. Congress money laundering hearing of Saudi Billionaire " Maan Al sanea" with *bank of America* and The owner of Saad Hospital and Schools in the Eastern Province in *Saudi Arabia* and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Awal Bank in *Bahrain* Wit

Re: [deal.II] imposing symmetric boundary conditions on the axis of symmetry of a 2D domain

In that case, you should just be able to use zero-flux boundary conditions along the mirror plane. The way I typically picture it is that if you have the same thing happening on either side of a mirror plane, you can't have in-flow or out-flow. On a side note, depending on how far along you ar

[deal.II] possible Error of compute_no_normal_flux_constraints? Also: Manifolds vs. Boundaries

Dear fellow dealii users (and developers), I think I ran into another bug here, but there is always the possibilty that I just tried to do something stupid. Therefore, before I post this on GitHub, I'd like someone who knows what he/she is doing to have a look at that. Outline of the Problem: U

Re: [deal.II] Re: linking to lapacke

Jean-Paul, this was useful. Now cmake finds lapack ( I added also -DBLA_VENDOR=Generic otherwise cmake loads the Apple framework ) but it is not lapacke, as Denis was pointing out. ( BTW, it seems also that cmake finds lapack in a directory that is different from the one input by -DLAPACK_DIR=/u

[deal.II] Re: linking to lapacke

You are right, Denis. In fact, though, sinocos/FindLAPACK.cmake introduces some conflicts, besides the need of FindBLAS.cmake

Re: [deal.II] imposing symmetric boundary conditions on the axis of symmetry of a 2D domain

Hi Bangerth, Thanks for your answering. Here I have a 2D domain and the phase-field model is complicated, so I have simplify the equations just like as follow:

[deal.II] Re: linking to lapacke

Hi Alberto, My understanding is that CMake does not provide any interface to find Lapacke ("e" is important here) within their FindLAPACK https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/blob/master/Modules/FindLAPACK.cmake . So one would need to write extra code to pick-up lapacke.h and all. AFAIK it's not