[deal.II] Re: Adding periodicity to a thin sample with one element in thickness direction

2017-05-17 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Hi Hamed, You're welcome. I'm glad that we helped you resolve the issue! Best, Jean-Paul On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 4:07:08 PM UTC+2, Hamed Babaei wrote: > > Hello all, > > You are right. I was running in debug mode, slowing down the code. > Thank you very much for your incredible help. I

[deal.II] Re: Adding periodicity to a thin sample with one element in thickness direction

2017-05-17 Thread Hamed Babaei
Hello all, You are right. I was running in debug mode, slowing down the code. Thank you very much for your incredible help. I appreciate your kindness and generosity to support the community. Best regards, Hamed -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing

[deal.II] Re: assembling question

2017-05-17 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
You're welcome! On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 1:08:24 PM UTC+2, Ashkan Dorostkar wrote: > > Thank you, > This helped a lot. I didn't remember that rule at the moment. > > Ali > > On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 12:38:48 PM UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: >> >> Dear Ali, >> >> If you apply the

[deal.II] Re: assembling question

2017-05-17 Thread Ashkan Dorostkar
Thank you, This helped a lot. I didn't remember that rule at the moment. Ali On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 12:38:48 PM UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Dear Ali, > > If you apply the product rule > to this term, does it then look a little more

[deal.II] Re: assembling question

2017-05-17 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Dear Ali, If you apply the product rule to this term, does it then look a little more managable? Regards, Jean-Paul On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 12:20:18 PM UTC+2, Ashkan Dorostkar wrote: > > Dear all, > I want to solve a system of equation for

[deal.II] assembling question

2017-05-17 Thread Ashkan Dorostkar
Dear all, I want to solve a system of equation for elasticity and I have an extra term in the my equations which is of the form -grad(b.u) here "b" is a vector of size DIM and "u" is the displacements with DIM components. I am a bit lost on how to express this with fe_values. Any help is

Re: [deal.II] Error in the second derivative of solution...?

2017-05-17 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Thats great! I'm glad that you've managed to work it out :-) Best, Jean-Paul On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 10:06:18 AM UTC+2, hanks0...@gmail.com wrote: > > Thank you very much!! > > It seems that I can solve my problem. > > Thank you! > > Kyusik. > -- The deal.II project is located at

Re: [deal.II] Error in the second derivative of solution...?

2017-05-17 Thread hanks0227
Thank you very much!! It seems that I can solve my problem. Thank you! Kyusik. -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [deal.II] Re: Step 13 & 14 -- Different BCs on different boundary indicators

2017-05-17 Thread Daniel Arndt
Dear Elena, I want to do something like below code, but I don't know how to write it > correctly: > > template > void > Solver::*assemble_linear_system *(LinearSystem _system) > { > > VectorTools::interpolate_boundary_values (dof_handler, >