Re: [deal.II] deal.II problem on Mac (Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64)

On 07/11/2017 10:35 AM, Peimeng Yin wrote: I used deal.II to solve my personal code and I can run it on Linux, but when I run it on Mac, it shows bug as follows. I am wondering anyone can help me on it. Location: /usr/local/deal.II /usr/local/lib : links to deal.II, lac,

Re: [deal.II] Best approach for multi-variable system with multiple grids

On 07/11/2017 08:29 AM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group wrote: Which of those two approaches is more beneficial for me (especcially after I would like to extend it afterwards to two additional equations? Or is there another approach I did not consider yet? I don't think I quite

[deal.II] deal.II problem on Mac (Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64)

Hi all, I used deal.II to solve my personal code and I can run it on Linux, but when I run it on Mac, it shows bug as follows. I am wondering anyone can help me on it. Location: /usr/local/deal.II /usr/local/lib : links to deal.II, lac, base,tbb,lib*,libdeal_II.g.dylib, libdeal_II.dylib

Re: [deal.II] step-40. petsc with openmp

Hi Timo, Does this still hold true of the Petsc wrappers not being thread-safe? Regards, Kartik Jujare On Friday, March 14, 2014 at 3:24:18 PM UTC+1, Timo Heister wrote: > > > I am trying to use openmp in the element assemble procedure of step-40. > Has > > anyone done this before? Any

[deal.II] Best approach for multi-variable system with multiple grids

I have a coupled system of two equations:

[deal.II] Re: Is there a list of requirements for the different examples?

> > Yes, but my problem is that I built PETSc using > --with-scalar-type=complex, and still dealII thinks that it was built > without complex support (according to the flag). > Am Dienstag, 11. Juli 2017 15:19:37 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Paul Pelteret: > > Hi Maxi, > > To the best of my knowledge,

Re: [deal.II] lexicographic ordering in 3D

Thanks for your quick and useful answer, and explanation ... GridReordering was what I needed! Now I see that I did not mean lexicographic order, that I had assumed from the begining in 2), but it didn't read like that in the email. I apologize for the wrong formulation of the question. *Some

[deal.II] Re: Is there a list of requirements for the different examples?

That is interesting. I got exactly that output (did not know that I can do that, btw.), but my PETSC-installation is configured with complex numbers. How can I then tell dealII during the configuration process that that is the case? Am Dienstag, 11. Juli 2017 14:10:47 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Paul