[deal.II] Best practices for solving simulation(s) with multiple boundaries

2018-10-11 Thread phillip mobley
Hello all, I am currently creating an electrostatic solver where the simulation will need to solve a problem with multiple boundaries. I will be using a simulation of a parallel plate capacitor as an example of what I am trying to do. In this simulation, I will need to solve for the voltage

Re: [deal.II] Boundary condition from nodal traction values

2018-10-11 Thread Lucky Qin
Dear Dr. Bangerth, Thank you for the explanation. I am trying to study fluid-structure interaction and use Dealii as the solid solver for the problem. However, I only have a traction vector at individual points. This is because the traction vector is obtained from a discrete fluid solver

Re: [deal.II] Boundary condition from nodal traction values

2018-10-11 Thread Lucky Qin
Dear Jean-Paul, Thank you for the answer. Sorry for the late response. I tried to use 'system_rhs += traction_vector' and it works! The code is much easier now. I do have a pre-assembled global traction vector. This vector is obtained from a fluid solver (based on Lattice Boltzmann method).

[deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #52

2018-10-11 Thread Rene Gassmoeller
Hello everyone! This is deal.II newsletter #52. It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the deal.II finite element library. ## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features: #7330: ScaLAPACKMatrix: improve documentation (proposed by BenBrands)

[deal.II] Re: Error in example 16

2018-10-11 Thread David Wells
Dear Maxi, This is a bug with the current implementation: it looks like one of the recent commits broke something. Thanks for reporting this! Thanks, David Wells On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 9:46:42 AM UTC-4, Maxi Miller wrote: > > When trying to run example 16 on a new installation of

Re: [deal.II] some publications based on deal.II

2018-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 10/11/2018 12:58 AM, Praveen C wrote: > Praveen Chandrashekar and Markus Zenk, "Well-balanced nodal discontinuous > Galerkin method for Euler equations with gravity", J. Sci. Comp., Vol. 71, > Issue 3, pp. 1062-1093, June 2017. > http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-016-0339-x > >

[deal.II] Error in example 16

2018-10-11 Thread 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group
When trying to run example 16 on a new installation of deal.II, I get the error Cycle 0 Number of active cells: 80 Number of degrees of freedom: 89 (by level: 8, 25, 89) An error occurred in line <1191> of file in function

Re: [deal.II] Re: Boost serialization check fails for boost 1.68.0

2018-10-11 Thread 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group
I already compiled other libraries (such as ADOL-C) based on the boost libraries in the system, thus I would have preferred if I could use this boost-version. Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 17:32:15 UTC+2 schrieb Wolfgang Bangerth: > > On 10/10/2018 07:34 AM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group

[deal.II] some publications based on deal.II

2018-10-11 Thread Praveen C
Praveen Chandrashekar and Markus Zenk, "Well-balanced nodal discontinuous Galerkin method for Euler equations with gravity", J. Sci. Comp., Vol. 71, Issue 3, pp. 1062-1093, June 2017. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-016-0339-x Juan Pablo Gallego-Valencia, Christian Klingenberg,