Hello everyone!
This is deal.II newsletter #77.
It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the
deal.II finite element library.
## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features:
#7987: Fix a couple of typos. (proposed by bangerth; merged)
On 5/1/19 9:45 AM, Nico Bombace wrote:
>
> > 2) I have seen some some impact/contact problems in the step tutorials,
> > would this work in dynamics as well?
>
> You'd have to write a time loop around it. In essence, you have to
> solve
> a nonlinear contact problem in each
Thank you for your answer, I have only a further small comment
On 5/1/19 9:02 AM, Nico Bombace wrote:
> >
> > After some time using Abaqus/Explicit, I decided to start to code my
> > library because it would give more liberty in terms of implementation of
> > new algorithms.
> > I am
On 5/1/19 5:58 AM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group wrote:
>
> I don't know NOX, but is it using an update that it adds to the
> solution in
> each step? If so, you need to have the correct boundary conditions
> in the
> initial guess already. What happens if you only
Dear all,
After some time using Abaqus/Explicit, I decided to start to code my
library because it would give more liberty in terms of implementation of
new algorithms.
I am starting the deal.ii video lectures and tutorials and I have some
questions regarding a particular class of problems,
I wanted to test the new ScratchData- and CopyData-Classes for DG-subfaces,
and thus used Test 3 with a locally refined grid. The result shows
significant distortions at the transitions between refinement levels.
Should that be, or is that a bug? Or is it just the missing handling of
subfaces
Am Dienstag, 30. April 2019 05:59:05 UTC+2 schrieb Wolfgang Bangerth:
>
>
> Maxi,
>
> > What did you have to do? I was going to reproduce your problem today
> by
> > installing a Trilinos version that has NOX enabled. Is this moot
> now,
> > i.e., was it a bug in your code or
