[deal.II] deal.II for Inverse problems in non-linear elasticity

2019-09-19 Thread Prashant Singh
Hi, I am new to deal.II and want to assess the suitability of the library for my project. I am trying to solve an Inverse Cauchy problem in 3D nonlinear elasticity. I have observed displacement data at partial boundary as well in partial regions inside the body, and want to reconstruct the

Re: [deal.II] The type of particle properties

2019-09-19 Thread Jinhyun Choo
Dear Rene, Thank you so much for your excellent explanation. I now understand and agree with that the approach you have chosen is the best way for this purpose. Yidong also told me that he has successfully implemented such helper functions for converting a particle's several features (although

[deal.II] Re: Specifying internal "boundary" conditions

2019-09-19 Thread Rene Gassmöller
Hi Melanie, we also have a few examples in ASPECT that probably do what you are aiming for. E.g. the cookbook prescribed_velocity (https://github.com/geodynamics/aspect/blob/master/cookbooks/prescribed_velocity/prescribed_velocity.cc#L295) uses the `add_line` and `set_inhomogeneity` functions

[deal.II] Re: Specifying internal "boundary" conditions

2019-09-19 Thread Mélanie Gérault
Dear Bruno, Thank you, that helps a lot. Melanie On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 1:58:39 PM UTC-4, Bruno Turcksin wrote: > > Mélanie, > > I am not sure I understand exactly what you want to do but often people > who want internal boundary conditions, really just want to impose some >

[deal.II] Re: Cmake-GUI error

2019-09-19 Thread Bruno Blais
Dear Gary, I use the cmake curse gui a lot (which I guess is what you mean by cmake gui). I have never had any problem installing dealii using it. It should work. On Wednesday, 18 September 2019 17:26:12 UTC-4, Gary Roach wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at 3:13:54 PM UTC-7, GaryR

Re: [deal.II] Instantiation MappingFEField with hp::DoFHandler

2019-09-19 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
> If I do end up needing those features, should I open an issue and ask to get > it assigned to myself? And then refer to that issue for pull requests? Yes. Here are a couple of examples for similar issues that require a lot of work before they can finally be closed: